Laserfiche WebLink
,u U II <br /> Wright secured permission to enter the Gemelos Property and More for Less Station (also known as <br /> . Cheaper Gas Station) for casing elevation survey and to collect groundwater level measurements Wright <br /> had Triple"E" survey the additional well casings to a known sea-level referenced datum for groundwater <br /> level measurements for the three sites as required by and agreed with PHS-EHD for determmmg <br /> groundwater gradient(see attached Table 1) <br /> Groundwater Samplinu <br /> Monitoring well MW-1 was purged using calculated well volume based upon the depth to water in the <br /> casing. Depth to groundwater measurements were made to the nearest one-one hundredth of one foot,and <br /> the well was checked for the presence of separate phase product The well was purged to remove stagnant <br /> water in the well casing. As each purge volume was removed, measurements of pH, electrical <br /> conductivity and temperature were taken until these parameters stabilized over two purge volume <br /> removals, which is interpreted to represent aquifer water entering the casing. The well was allowed to <br /> recover to about 80% of the initially measured water level, miter which the sample was collected. <br /> Sampling was performed on September 21, 2000 <br /> i <br /> The water sample was carefully collected with a clean bailer and poured into the appropriate laboratory <br /> prepared container with minimum cavitation The water sample was labeled, logged onto a chain-of- <br /> custody form, and placed in a chilled ice chest Upon completion of well sampling, the well was sealed <br /> with an expansion plug and well box cover bolted down <br /> Subsurface Conditions <br /> The monitoring well was drilled immediately adjacent to Boring B-3 (within 0 5 foot) due the very close <br /> proximity of subsurface utilities, and the location of the previously observed dissolved contaminants <br /> The site stratigraphy showed a silty clay to a depth of about 6 feet This clay was underlain by sand and <br /> interbedded sand and clayey silt to depths of about 20 feet The interbedded sand and clayey silt strata <br /> compose the aquifer Water levels observed during drilling suggest that this is an unconfined to weakly <br /> confined aquifer A clayey sand forms the local confining stratum which underlies the uppermost aquifer <br /> zone sandy sequence This aquifer and confining soil stratigraphy is similar to that observed in the <br /> previous Wright borings(see Figures 1 and 2) <br /> Regional lithologic lateral and vertical variations are present in the shallow aquifer strata and underlying <br /> confining strata, which are typical for river and floodplain deposits in this portion of the San Joaquin <br /> Valley (see Geologic Cross Section, Figure 3) While lateral and vertical variation are present in the <br /> aquifer strata, these strata as a whole form the uppermost waterbearing aquifer (or hydro-) stratigraphy <br /> between about 10-to 20 feet in the area explored. These underlying coniimng strata display some lateral <br /> lithologic variation,and were not observed to yield water although the strata were very moist_ <br /> Chemical Analysis <br /> One (l) groundwater sample was analyzed at a State certified analytical laboratory from the exploratory <br /> boring These samples were chemically analyzed for the following, Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as <br /> Gasoline (TPHG), Benzene (B), Toluene (7), Ethylbenzene (E) and Xylene (X), Methyl-tert-butyl-ether <br /> (MTBE) and fuel oxygenates, 1,2 Dtchloroethane and Ethylene Dibromide using EPA Methods <br /> 3510/8015,8020, 8240 and <br />