Laserfiche WebLink
ATC Associates Inc. <br /> 1117 Lone Palm Avenue, Suite B <br /> %TC Modesto, California 95351 <br /> _ -V0 <br /> 209-579-2221 <br /> A s s o c i A r E s i N c fax:209-579-2225 <br /> 1988; approximately 350 to 400 cubic yards of soil were excavated from April 25 to 28, 1988. <br /> Laboratory analyses of soil samples collected from the sidewalls of the enlarged excavation indicated <br /> low concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons remained at the south and southeastern portion of the <br /> excavation. <br /> On February 26, 1993, Parker Environmental Services (P.E.S.) advanced seven soil borings (BH1 <br /> through BH7). Soil samples were collected from each boring and a groundwater sample was collected <br /> from.each boring except BH7. Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in soil samples collected from <br /> all the borings except BHI and BH3. Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in all of the groundwater <br /> samples. Water levels measured at the site on March 2, 1993 indicated the groundwater flow direction <br /> was to the southeast. Refer to P.E.S.'s Interim Report on Subsurface Investigation Work at Cheaper! <br /> 4 37 dated April 20, 1993 for more details. <br /> Froniluly to October 1995,P.E.S. conducted subsurface investigation activities that included installing <br /> four monitoring wells (MW5 through MW8) and advancing 14 hand augured soil borings (B8 through <br /> B21).; B15 through B21 were advanced off-site to the west, southwest, and south. Groundwater was <br /> encountered at approximately 6.5 feet bgs. Soil and groundwater samples were collected from B8,B10 <br /> through B18, B20, B21, and MW5 through MW7. A groundwater sample was also collected from <br /> MW8. Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in all of the soil samples except for the samples <br /> collected from MWfthrough MW7, B14 located east of the former UST location, and B20 and B21 <br /> located off-site to the southwest and south, respectively. Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in the <br /> groundwater samples except for the samples collected from B14, B20, B21, MWI, MW2, MW3, <br /> MW6, and MW7. MW4 was not sampled due to the presence of approximately 0.02 inches of free <br /> product. The reported groundwater flow direction on September 25, 1995 was approximately due <br /> north. Refer to the report prepared by P.E.S. titled Environmental Site Investigation Methods and <br /> Findings: Drilling of Soil Borings, Drilling and Installation of Groundwater Monitoring Wells f <br /> Collection and Analyses of Soil and Groundwater Samples, dated November 17, 1995 for more <br /> information. <br /> �4 <br /> In a letter dated April 11, 2002, the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD) <br /> indicated that upgradient monitoring wells, MW2 and MW3, could be reduced to annual monitoring <br /> and that the lateral and vertical extent of soil contamination remains undefined. The EHD requested <br /> t submittal of a workplan to refine the lateral and vertical extent of soil contamination. In response to the <br /> EHD;request, H2OGEOL submitted the Work Plan for Additional Soil Characterization dated June <br /> 10, 2003, which proposed advancing 14 hand auger borings at the site for the purpose of collecting soil <br /> samples. <br /> r <br /> On September I I and 12, 2003, a 500-gallon capacity used oil UST was excavated and removed from <br /> the site by Walton Engineering, Inc. Petroleum hydrocarbons and metals were detected in a soil sample <br /> collected from below the former location of the UST from a depth of approximately seven feet bgs. <br /> Refer'to Grayland Environmental's Underground Storage Tank and Fuel Dispenser Removal Report, <br /> dated October 16, 2003,for more information. <br /> sAery omowW\2584710037,reports\3gr-2005.doe 2 <br /> f <br /> i <br /> i5 ' <br />