Laserfiche WebLink
ATC Associates Inc. <br /> 1117 Lone Palm Avenue, Suite B <br /> %TC <br /> 0 <br /> Modesto, California 95351 <br /> 209-579-2221 <br /> IV <br /> A S S O C i a r E S I n C. fax:209-579-2225 i <br /> M <br /> 7 <br /> In September 23 and 24, 2003, H2OGEOL collected groundwater samples from MW1 and MW4 <br /> through MW8. Petroleum hydrocarbons were detected in groundwater samples collected from these <br /> wells' The reported groundwater flow direction was to the north. Refer to H2OGEOL's Third Quarter, <br /> 2003+Groundwater Monitoring Report, dated October 31, 2003, for more information. <br /> In a letter dated November 14, 2003, the EM indicated that the proposed scope in the H20GEOL <br /> workNan was not adequate or necessary. The EHD requested that a workplan be prepared in the <br /> context of a site conceptual model that includes analytical data collected during removal of a waste oil <br /> tank from the site in September 2003. The requested workplan was submitted by ATC on February 2, <br /> 2004.' <br /> SAMPLING ACTIVITIES <br /> On September 30, 2005, ATC personnel collected groundwater samples from MWl and MW4 <br /> through MW8. The locations of the wells are shown on Figure 2. Prior to collection of groundwater <br /> f samples, the depth to water, pH, electrical conductivity, and temperature were measured Turbidity <br /> was visually observed in groundwater purged from the monitoring wells and recorded. Approximately <br /> three:well casing volumes were purged from each monitoring well prior to sampling. The wells were <br /> allowed to recover and samples were collected from each well using disposable polyethylene bailers. <br /> The groundwater samples collected from each well were submitted to State-certified Argon <br /> Laboratories Inc. Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (FLAP) Cert. No. 2359, in Ceres, <br /> California far chemical analysis of total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) utilizing <br /> Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)Method 8015M; benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes <br /> (BTEX) utilizing EPA Method 8021B; and methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), ethyl tertiary butyl <br /> ether (ETBE) di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), tertiary amyl ether(TAME), tertiary butyl ether (TBA), 1,2- <br /> dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), and 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB) utilizing EPA Method 8260B. <br /> Groundwater well purge and sample logs are contained in Attachment 1. <br /> GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION <br /> Water levels were measured in MW1 through MW8 on September 30, 2005. Depth to water in the <br /> shallow aquifer ranged from 5.68 to 7.71 feet below the tops of the well casing elevations, representing <br /> an average decrease in the shallow water table elevation of approximately 0.17 feet since June 2005. <br /> The water level data were used to develop the groundwater elevation contour map(Figure 3). Shallow <br /> groundwater flow in the uppermost aquifer beneath the site is towards the north-northeast. The average <br /> hydraulic gradient on September 30, 2005, was calculated to be 0.0035 feet per foot,or approximately <br /> 18.5 feet per mile. A summary of groundwater monitoring data is presented in Table 1. <br /> i <br /> ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> I <br /> Groundwater samples collected from MWl, MW4, MW5, MW6, MW7, and MW8 contained no <br /> detectable concentrations of TPHg or BTEX constituents. <br /> s:lenviromema112584'AO037Teportsl3gr-2005.doc 3 <br /> 7 <br />