Laserfiche WebLink
• Unocal Station No #6981 <br /> November 9, 1995 <br /> hydrocarbons, the vapor stream is discharged to the atmosphere As of January 23, 1995, <br /> when the VES was shut down, the VES had operated approximately 116 days, or 94% of <br /> the time All of the vapor extraction wells were open and used during system operation <br /> The VES was shut down in anticipation of a switch to catalytic oxidization mode <br /> Historical VES chemical analytical data are summarized in Table 1, and historical VES <br /> operational data are summarized in Table 2 <br /> CURRENT QUARTER'S ACTIVITIES <br /> Field activities conducted at the subject site during the third quarter 1995 are discussed <br /> below <br /> Monitoring and Sampling of Groundwater Monitoring Wells <br /> Groundwater monitoring wells were monitored and sampled by MPDS Services, Inc of <br /> Concord, California on July 26 and 27, 1995 Based on measurements collected by <br /> MPDS, the groundwater beneath the site appears to flow to the northeast at an approximate <br /> gradient of 0 005 (consistent with previous data) The groundwater table was <br /> • approximately one foot lower than the previous quarter <br /> Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) were detected in groundwater samples <br /> from wells MW-2, MW-4, MW-5, and MW-7 at concentrations ranging from 130 to 3,300 <br /> parts per billion (ppb) Benzene was detected in wells MW-2, MW-4 through MW-8, <br /> MW-10, MW-11, and MW-13 at concentrations ranging from 0 55 to 640 ppb The <br /> Quarterly Data Report dated August 18, 1995 was submitted by MPDS to the San Joaquin <br /> County Public Health Services (SJCPHS) and California Regional Water Quality Control <br /> Board (CRWQCB). <br /> VES Operation <br /> San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD) issued Authority <br /> to Construct Permit Number N-3335-2-0, dated April 27, 1995 for modification of the <br /> Baker Furnace abatement unit On May 16, 1995, the VES began operating in the <br /> catalytic mode, but could not meet the destruction efficiencies specified in the operating <br /> permit During May through September 1995, several attempts were made to meet the <br /> required 95% destruction efficiency by changing the VES operating parameters The VES <br /> was shut down after each attempt to increase destruction efficiency In addition to <br /> assessing the integrity of the mechanical operation of the abatement unit, the influent <br /> airstream was sampled for compounds that might have poisoned the catalyst, including lead <br /> 495502-5 2 <br />