Laserfiche WebLink
i � r <br /> MEMORANDUI, <br /> T <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD - CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> 3443 Routier Road, Suite A Phone: (916) 361-5600 <br /> Sacramento, CA 95827-3098 ATSS Phone: 8-495-5600 <br /> TO: Antonia Vorster FROM: Michael Higgins <br /> Senior Engineer Associate Engineer <br /> DATE: 8 October 1991 SIGNATURE: <br /> SUBJECT: DIVIDEND DEVELOPMENT SITE, TRACY, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> I have reviewed Toxic Technology, Inc. 's (TTI) 15 August 1991 Remediation Workplan <br /> (workplan) and the 22 July 1991 Report of Findings (report) of the site <br /> investigation for the Dividend Development Company property in Tracy. The report <br /> describes the polluted soil and ground water, in addition to free product floating <br /> on the ground water in one monitoring well (MW), discovered at the site. The <br /> workplan proposes to excavate and remove the polluted soil to a nearby area where <br /> TTI will reduce the pollutant concentrations via biotreatment. Based on these data, <br /> TTI has concluded the source of the pollution is the adjacent pipeline right-of-way <br /> now owned by Santa Fe Pacific Pipeline Partners, Ltd. (SFPPP) . (To my knowledge, <br /> SFPPP is not addressing the polluted soil and ground water in this section of the <br /> pipeline right-of-way at this time.) <br /> During the site investigation, TTI sampled the soil profile at increasing depths in <br /> seven boreholes which they subsequently converted to ground water monitoring wells <br /> (NW) . Soil samples from the unsaturated zone of five of the seven boreholes <br /> contained substantial concentrations of fuel components. Sampling and analysis also <br /> detected free product and dissolved fuel components in the monitoring well (MW-2) <br /> closest to the suspected pollutant source. The sampling and analysis indicated that <br /> the pollution is probably largely confined to the unsaturated zone and the free <br /> product is localized to an area immediately adjacent to the MW-2. The polluted soil <br /> appears to be confined to an area within a 200-foot radius north from the junction <br /> of the northern boundaries of the pipeline and freeway rights-of-way. <br /> The workplan is deficient as follows: <br /> 1. The workplan must address the removal of free product from the capillary fringe <br /> and the ground water. <br /> 2. The workplan should describe how TTI will determine they have excavated all the <br /> polluted soil . A method whereby one might assess the excavation's necessary <br /> extent would require that the soil is excavated to the pollution's visible <br /> extent. This limit could be estimated where discolored and/or stained soils, <br /> or oil sheens on the ground water in the bottom of the excavation, were no <br /> longer visible. Subsequently, a statistically valid number of soil samples <br /> and/or ground water samples from the excavation's sides and bottom would be <br /> obtained and analyzed for the pollutants. When the pollutant concentrations at <br /> the limits of the excavation are below analytical detection limits, all the <br /> polluted soil has been removed. <br />