Laserfiche WebLink
Remedial Action Plan Addendum January 14, 1993 <br /> Southland Store No. 20304, 455 Grant Line Rd., Tracy, CA 4 <br /> MW the location of the building, the closest monitoring well (MW-5) in that direction is approximately 50 <br /> V <br /> feet north and has not exhibited detectable hydrocarbon concentrations. Groundwater samples <br /> collected from wells south and west of the potential source area have also Indicated an absence of <br /> hydrocarbons above detectable levels. Concentrations within individual wells have fluctuated <br /> significantly, although the variances appear to coincide among the wells as a group. The variances <br /> are probably caused by seasonal groundwater elevation fluctuations. The distribution of <br /> hydrocarbons along the trough may also be related to the depth of the wells in this area. Generally, <br /> groundwater samples collected from wells installed to less than 10 feet below grade, such as MW-9 <br /> and MW-10, have contained hydrocarbon concentrations an order of magnitude greater than those <br /> installed to 15 or 25 feet below grade. Therefore, the observed hydrocarbon distribution may be <br /> V <br /> affected by the depth and source from which the water samples were collected: The shallower wells <br /> are recharging solely from the upper few feet of the aquifer, where higher dissolved concentrations <br /> of hydrocarbons are expected to occur. <br /> 2.0 PROPOSED REMEDIAL ACTION <br /> The primary purpose of proposed remedial action at the site is to reduce hydrocarbon <br /> 64+%.1.- concentrations in soil and groundwater to obtain site closure. Groundwater Technology proposes <br /> to remediate the site In two phases. Phase I will consist of gaining hydraulic control (containment) <br /> at the site through groundwater extraction and treatment. Phase II will consist of remediating <br /> impacted soils that continue to contaminate the groundwater, using an appropriate remedial <br /> alternative. The alternative will be determined after the effectiveness of groundwater extraction and <br /> treatment system has been evaluated. Figure 4 illustrates the decision process that will be used in <br /> choosing Phase II remedial strategy. <br /> 2.1 Groundwater Containment and Treatment (Phase 1) <br /> Data review suggests the presence of highly variable hydraulic conductivities in the saturated zone. <br /> `A These conditions have led to channeling dissolved hydrocarbons in high conductivity areas, <br /> Increasing the accumulation of petroleum hydrocarbons in finer materials or lower hydraulic <br /> 4 conductivity areas. Based on this Information, containing and remediating the groundwater should <br /> be the first priority to reduce potential adverse environmental impact. Containing the affected <br /> R3263A1.SLi <br /> �ED�' GROUNDWATER <br /> nE <br /> TECHNOLOGY,INC. <br />