Laserfiche WebLink
l <br /> I70 FEASIBILITY TESTING <br /> 71 Oxygen Injection Feasibility Study <br /> On June 21, 2004, SECOR conducted an oxygen injection test on oxygen infection well S-1 <br /> Approximately 150 cubic feet (ft) of oxygen ,was injected into well S-1 (Figure 2) for <br /> approximately 30 minutes Dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations were measured with a DO <br /> meter equipped with a down hole probe in well S-1 before and immediately following <br /> completion of the injection test During the test, injection pressures and flow rates were <br /> recorded from the injection well and lower explosive limit (LEL) oxygen measurements were <br /> Icollected in S-1 and in adjacent wells EX-1 and MW-5 <br /> Prior to the injection test, DO concentrations in the S-1, EX-1, and MW-5 were 2 6 milligrams <br /> per liter (mg/L), 2 2 mg/L, and 0 4 mg/L, respectively After the injection test, DO <br /> concentrations did not significantly increase, DO concentrations in EX-1 and MW-5 increased <br /> only 0 1 mg/L each <br /> IBased on these measurements it was determined that the radius of influence for oxygen <br /> injection is less than 5 feet Oxygen injection is not a feasible remedial alternative for this <br /> site Field notes for the oxygen injection feasibility test are included in Appendix B <br /> 7.2 Groundwater Pumping Test <br /> The purpose of this test was to evaluate hydrogeologic Conditions beneath the site and to <br /> determine whether groundwater pumping from EX-1 is a feasible alternative for remediating <br /> dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons and MtBE in groundwater beneath the site <br /> Methodology <br /> Before beginning the step drawdown and constant rate pumping tests, pressure transducers <br />' with built-in data-loggers were installed in pumping well EX-1 and observation wells S-1 and <br /> MW-5 on August 11, 2004 to monitor water levels before, during, and after aquifer testing <br /> (Figures 2) The data-loggers were programmed to record water level depths at one-minute <br />' intervals <br /> A step-drawdown test was conducted on August 11, 2004 using a submersible pump in well <br /> EX-1 Before the start of the test, water levels in pumping well EX-1 and the two observation <br /> wells (S-1 and MW-5) were monitored EX-1 was subsequently pumped for a specified <br /> period at different pumping rates (steps) while monitoring changes in the water level in the <br /> pumping well The water levels and corresponding times were recorded during each step to <br /> I allow for analysis of the drawdown attributed to each step, and to provide information needed <br /> for the selection of an optimum pumping rate for the constant-rate pumping test The , <br /> optimum pumping rate is the highest pumping rate that will not draw the water level down to <br /> the pump over the duration of the constant-rate pumping test (approximately 24 hours) <br /> Based on the analysis of the step-drawdown test the constant-rate test was initiated on <br /> August 12, 2004 by pumping EX-1 at 0 8 gallons per minute (gpm) The objective of the test <br />' was to create hydraulic stress in the aquifer by pumping from well EX-1 at a constant <br /> + pumping rate while monitoring drawdown in observation wells S-1 and MW-5 After <br /> approximately 400 minutes of continuous pumping the constant rate test was stopped due to <br /> Ia shortage of fuel in the generator The lapse in pumping lasted approximately 10 minutes <br /> 32262 Assessment&Feasibility Report&SCM doe 10 September 30 2004 <br /> I77EL 32262 04 0502 <br />