Laserfiche WebLink
O <br /> continuously <br /> _ r+dwater was 1,030 <br /> ---�-_------ � � �restarting _ est (approx+i�ately pumping <br /> our constant rate ed in the <br /> the generator and 1 logg <br /> prior to refuelingr levels were continuo Y <br /> ed at 0 8 qpm for the anrat remainder est wa a Flow <br /> Pur During the cons ells tank on-site <br /> minutes) ation w allon-capacity holding the system to <br /> well and the two obsery ed to a 6,500 g <br /> discharge {lvwmeter to register water flow 99 <br /> groundwater was _ to pump+ng test, groundwater <br /> at le east <br /> Extracted g onitored using a totalizing data were <br /> rates were +�' nclus+on of the constant is the wells recd recovery <br /> At the cv drawdown and conductivity (K)= <br /> the holding tank d recorded until T ieeresult resulting <br /> hydraulic co <br /> data was monitored and <br /> levels issivitY (T), Y <br /> of their pre-p aquifer parameters of transm within <br /> percent the d recover"�l <br /> analyzed to estimate own an hs 1 through <br /> Data <br /> plots of drawdown <br /> and storat+v+ty (S) are discussed below 5 and 5_1 are presented in Grap <br /> u+fer testing ells MNN- rovided in-rable 6 <br /> Results of a4 1 and observad awlicparameters is p <br /> pumping well of calculated by <br /> of ca well EX-1 <br /> 4 A summa! Pumping Test lied to extraction -rhe <br /> pump m and 0 0 gpm were aPP 5 for 37 minutes <br /> Step-Drawdown ed at 0 umping at <br /> rates of 0 5 gpm and 1 EX 1 was initially pumped <br /> 60 minutes +d and final <br /> pumping drawdown test t 0 gpm After app 0 9 9pn' for the test was <br /> during the step- to approx+mately the steptest <br /> on <br /> pumping rate was then increased at a rate of 0 9Qrpnvernight <br /> p pumping rate was +notes of pumping to rerA 4 hour <br /> 1 0 gpM the p 1 was allowed m for the <br /> After approxirnately 60 n' well E step-test a pumping rate of 0 $ 9p <br /> step the groundwater in <br /> terminated and drawdown data for the <br /> the analysis of the <br /> ecrosen rate <br /> pumping test was Aquifer Recovery s the pumping <br /> Test and 1 using 0 a 9pmr� 0 <br /> Constant-Rate pumping ,rformed on EX` {or 1,430 <br /> umping test wasp of 617 feet in extraumn,g from well EX` wells <br /> The constant-rate aximum drawdowan observed After p levels were monitored in <br /> the test a m approximately 1 hour, until the <br /> During wn, and groundwater recovery �mpiied <br /> I, and 0 07 fee was shut do were recorded far app later level data <br /> minutes, the pump August 13, 2004 to determine <br /> and 4VMf-b Groundwater the wells on A g data-logger, and later used the constant <br /> Ex-1, g-1, wed from iiected Burin <br /> data loggers were <br /> removed <br /> downloaded from Field notes co <br /> throughout aquifer testing uifer beneath the site <br /> hydraul+c properties of the a W 2 <br /> rate test are provided in A which was �icuiated <br /> rate was used, m for the step <br /> Data Analysis umPin9 1 0 g test and the <br /> weighted value far P nstant_rate test and <br /> gpm step- method <br /> analysis' a time- m used for the co 1935} <br /> Dor data rate of 0 $ gp the extraction well during the the Theis ( Drawdown <br /> the pumping fromnt_rate analyzed using Program s <br /> from data collected modeling p ti�es_and, <br /> test Drawdown S constaoftware test <br /> groundwater to earth_ used for <br /> were cansiderto be due__._ <br /> first 400 minutes e tpQTES-OLV these data were not <br /> applied using the 1 ander- EX- <br /> observed <br /> 1 therefore, <br /> 1 the adlaGent wells S- fro wets EXE , 1 D <br /> observed in ump+ng fro - 1 during the <br /> not due to the effects from p coon wet, EX- T of th and <br /> his the extraction <br /> Y issivity ( ) <br /> the drawdown data from <br /> analysis of pumping test indicate a <br /> Results of the ant nstant-rate p Sep{ember 30,2004 <br /> gpm step test and the 0 $ co <br /> 1 M doc <br /> 32262 Assessm <br /> ent&Fess+h4liky Report&5C � <br /> 77E.L 32267 04 0502 <br />