Laserfiche WebLink
' Prior to conducting subsurface work at the site, USA was contacted to delineate subsurface <br /> utilities near the site with surface markings In addition, a private utility locator service was <br /> contracted to clear each of the proposed drilling locations and the boring locations were <br />' hand-cleared to five feet bgs prior to beginning drilling activities <br /> 32 Soil Borings 1 CPT Advancement <br />' On June 2, 2004, SECOR supervised the drilling of one onsite groundwater monitoring well <br /> (MW-7), one oxygen infection test well (S-1), and one groundwater extraction test well (EX-1) <br /> (Figure 2 and Table 2) On July 26, 2004 SECOR supervised the drilling of two offsite <br /> groundwater monitoring wells (MW-8 and MW-9) (Figure 2, Table 2) The wells were drilled <br /> using a truck-mounted drilling rig equipped with 8-inch diameter hollow-stem augers (HSAs) <br /> for the infection and monitoring wells and 10-inch HSAs for the extraction well <br />' On August 2, 2004 SECOR supervised the advancement of two CPT borings (CPT-1 and <br /> CPT-2) (Figure 2, Table 2) to approximately 83 feet bgs A description of CPT installation <br />' procedures and sod logs showing interpreted soil types is included in Appendix C <br /> All soil and ansate water generated during the well installation and hole clearing activities <br />' were stored in Department of Transportation (DOT) approved 55-gallon drums pending <br /> disposal Waste disposal is discussed in Section 8 0 Field notes documenting the well <br /> installation activities are included in Appendix B <br /> 33 Soil Sampling <br /> Soil samples were collected continuously from 5 to 17 feet bgs in well MW-7, from 5 to 25 <br /> feet bgs in EX-1, from 10 to 17 feet bgs in MW-8, and from 10 to 20 feet bgs in MW-9 using a <br /> split spoon sampler lined with 2-inch diameter by 6-inch-long brass sample tubes Samples <br /> were not collected or analyzed from S-1 due to its close proximity i e , within 5 feet, of EX-1 <br />' Well construction details and soil boring logs are included in Appendix C <br /> Downhole drilling equipment was steam-cleaned before drilling each borehole and sampling <br />' equipment was cleaned between each sampling interval Each soil sample was screened for <br /> hydrocarbon vapors using a portable photoionization detector (PID) Soil samples retained <br /> for analysis were sealed with Teflon® sheets and plastic caps, labeled and placed on ice in <br />' an insulated container for delivery under chain of custody to Kiff Analytical LLC in Davis, <br /> California The soils encountered during drilling were logged using the Unified Soil <br /> Classification System by a SECOR field geologist, working under the supervision of a <br /> California registered geologist <br />' Lithology encountered in each of the borings generally consisted of silt and sandy silt with <br /> minor lenses of clay and sand SECOR constructed two Generalized Geologic Cross <br />' Sections (Figure 4) which depict the subsurface soil types along the approximate <br /> groundwater flow direction Boring logs are included as Appendix C and CPT logs are <br /> included in Appendix D <br /> 1 <br /> 32262 Assessment&Feasibility Report&SCM doc 4 September 30,2004 <br />' 77EL 32262 04 0502 <br />