Laserfiche WebLink
a I I <br /> I <br /> L • A S S O C I A T E S I N C <br /> In April 2000, ATC personnel supervised the advancement of three soil borings at the site, SBS <br /> through SB 10 Soil borings were advanced using a truck mounted Geoprobe® narrow diameter <br /> ng employing direct push technology Soil and groundwater samples were collected and analyzed <br /> from each boring and were found to contain no detectable concentrations of total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg), total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPHd), benzene, <br /> toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes (BTEX), or methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) Field activities <br /> and analytical results were detailed in ATC's Summary Report of Additional Subsurface <br /> Investigation, dated September 7, 2000 <br /> In June 2000, ATC personnel supervised the advancement of three additional soil borings, MW4 <br /> through MW6 The bonngs were advanced using hollow stem auger drilling Approximately ten <br /> )Inches of free product was discovered in boring MW4 at a depth of 20 feet bgs In accordance <br /> with the approved work plan, the borings were completed as groundwater monitoring wells <br /> MW4, MW5 and MW6 Soil and groundwater samples taken from MW4 contained detectable <br /> concentrations of TPHg and TPHd, but did not contain detectable concentrations of BTEX or <br /> MTBE Sol] and groundwater samples from MW5 and MW6 did not contain detectable <br /> concentrations of TPHg, TPHd, BTEX, or MTBE Field activities and analytical results were <br /> detailed in ATC's Summaty Report of Additional Subsurface Investigation, dated September 7, <br /> 2000 <br /> SAMPLING ACTIVITIES <br /> On April 1, 2002, groundwater samples were collected by ATC personnel from monitoring wells <br /> MW 1 and MW3 through MW6 Well MW2 contained a heavy sheen of free product and was <br /> subsequently not sampled The locations of the monitoring wells are shown on Figure 2 Prior to <br /> collection of groundwater samples, the depth to water, pH, electrical conductivity, and <br /> temperature were measured in the monitoring wells and recorded A minimum of three well <br /> casing volumes were purged from each well prior to sampling The wells were allowed to recover <br /> and samples were collected from each well using dedicated disposable bailers <br /> The groundwater samples collected from each well were submitted to State-certified Argon <br /> Laboratories, Inc (FLAP Cert No 2359)for chemical analysis of TPHg and TPHd utilizing EPA <br /> method 8015 modified, and BTEX utilizing EPA Method 8020 Groundwater well purge and <br /> sample logs are contained in Attachment 1 <br /> GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION <br /> Water level measurements were collected from wells MW1 through MW6 Water levels ranged <br /> from 5 70 to 11 19 feet below the tops of the well casing elevations, representing an average <br /> increase in the water table elevation of approximately 141 feet since December 2001 The water <br /> level data were used to develop the groundwater elevation contour map (Figure 3) Assuming <br /> that horizontal isotropic conditions prevail, groundwater in the uppermost aquifer beneath the site <br /> w 1625001quad1y\1gr-2002 doc 2 <br />