Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> • A S S O C I A T E S I N C <br /> generally flowed towards the south The average hydraulic gradient on April 1, 2002 was <br /> calculated to be 0 001 ft/ft or approximately 5 3 ft/mile A summary of groundwater monitoring <br /> data is presented in Table 1 <br /> ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> TPHg, TPHd, and BTEX were not detected in the samples collected from well MW1, or from <br /> wells MW3 through MW6 Well MW2 was not sampled due to the presence of free product A <br /> summary of analytical results is presented in Table 2 Laboratory data sheets and chain-of- <br /> custody documentation are contained in Attachment 2 <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> Concentrations from wells MW 1 and MW3 to MW6 remain generally consistent with the results <br /> from the previous sampling event Free product was still present in well MW2 during the <br /> sampling event The direction and magmtude of groundwater flow is generally consistent with the <br /> previous sampling event, and groundwater elevations have increased since December 2001 <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> • Based on the results of the first quarter 2002 monitoring episode, we recommend the following <br /> • Conduct the Second Quarter 2002 groundwater monitoring and sampling of wells NMI <br /> through MW6 and analyze samples for TPHg, TPHd, and BTEX <br /> I <br /> w1625001quardyl1gr-2002 doc 3 <br />