Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> w + w f ! • Q <br /> A Solid Track Record in the Scientific Verification of Product Performance <br /> I Defining the Science: of Using Slow Release Compounds <br /> In the last five years,the use of ORC has clearly evolved from being an exploratory method to becoming a fully recognized <br /> technology To date over 5,000 ORC applications have been made in every state and in over a dozen countries This pro- <br /> gression has been clearly marked by a solid record of publications, by Regenesis and its customers, in the peer review litera- <br /> ture,at numerous technical conferences and in the trlde Itterattrre Almost 200 citations are now documented and the full list <br /> along with some of publications themselves can be reviewed on our,%cb site at www regenesis corn Most recently, a com- <br /> pendium of 39 papers have been published ("Accelerated Bioremediation Using Slow Release Compounds") representing all <br /> the papers that were presented at the full senes of the world renown Battelle Bioremediation Conferences since 1993 A copy <br /> is available from Regenesis that also contains an engineering manual for ORC treatment design and installation <br /> Cost Comparison <br />' By accelerating natural attenuation ORC applications can be more cost-effective th-in other alternative technologies and <br /> can inexpensively restore contaminated properties to market value Treatment with ORC is typically <br /> * 1/4 to 1/2 the cost of air sparging with vapor containment <br /> - equal to or less than the cost of excavation, hauling and disposal <br /> 11 of residual hydrocarbons from the floor of the UST exc-ivation <br />�.l - less than long-term monitonng costs of unassisted natural attenuation sites <br /> 1/4 the cost of a pump and treat system <br /> Compared with Air Sparging plus Vapor Containment <br /> An ORC application is typically inauch more cost effective than air sparging with vapor containment <br /> The following includes a summary of costs comparing ORC to air sparging systems on various sites* <br /> Site AS;SVE ESRC Sav rigs fi 5aysngs <br /> Oklahoma $158,000 $46,000 $112000 700/6 <br />' California 180,000 80,000 100 000 55% <br /> Alabama 99,000 26,000 73,000 74% <br /> 'AA tizlaes were derived utdependetteh b} the saes'cnmulnnts the crisis are 11111 av%terns ants with the obietuve of%tie elnhurt <br /> Compared with Natural Attenuation (Monitoring Only) <br /> ORC treatments, if properly applied can result in site closure in as little as one vear This can also <br /> be more cost effective than only monitoring the site and relying on unassisted natural attenuation Applying ORC <br /> can restore property to market value and avoid long term monitoring costs as well as potential future liability* <br />' Site Monitor Only DRC Samgs 7 Savings <br /> Oklahoma $54,000 $46,000 $ 8,000 15a/o <br /> Alabama 54,000 26,000 28,000 52% <br />' °Ali values were denved ondependently ltti the<rta omsulunts <br /> REGENESiS <br /> 1011 Calle Sombra - San Clemente - California 92673 <br />' Tel 949 366 8000 - Fax 949 366 8090 - e-mail orc®regenesis cam - www regenesis com <br />