My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARDING
>
550
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545261
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2020 3:28:37 PM
Creation date
1/30/2020 11:37:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545261
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0009791
FACILITY_NAME
CITY OF STOCKTON FIRE STATION #9
STREET_NUMBER
550
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARDING
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
13921007
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
550 E HARDING WAY
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
550 East Harding Way <br /> Page 2 <br /> Seasonal high depth to groundwater (Spring 1986) was 35 feet and current groundwater in <br /> the area (45 East Harding Way) is approximately 43 feet below ground surface. <br /> PHS/EHD suggests that 2 -3 soil borings be advanced to confirm the analytical results and <br /> to determine the vertical and horizontal extent of the soil contamination using either <br /> conventional drilling equipment or push-point technology. Should the soil contamination <br /> extend to groundwater, two cost effective options exist depending on the drilling <br /> methodology which was selected and the magnitude of soil contamination observed: either <br /> install groundwater monitoring wells or collect groundwater grab samples. <br /> If soil contamination has not been defined within the estimated scope of work, as time <br /> allows within the budget, additional soil borings should be drilled within the same phase of <br /> work. If soil contamination can be defined and appears to be limited, PHS/EHD suggests in <br /> addition to chemical analysis, the analysis of parameters which may include: organic <br /> carbon content, soil aeration, soil moisture content, soil pH, microbial population, and soil <br /> nutrient concentration (C:N:P ratio) that may aid in environmental fate analysis. <br /> Once the extent of soil contamination has been determined remedial alternatives should be <br /> evaluated. Should groundwater contamination be evidenced, it will be necessary to <br /> perform a groundwater investigation. <br /> If I can answer any further questions or provide regulatory input, please do not hesitate to <br /> contact me at (209) 468-0337. <br /> Donna Heran, REHS, Director <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> Mary Meays, Senior REHS Margar Lagorio, RE S <br /> Site Mitigation Unit Lead Senior <br /> MM1550HAR <br /> cc: Elizabeth Thayer, Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.