ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0001967 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. Mr Kyle Chnstie Project 0805-140 02 January 24, 1996 Page 2 MW-6 were added to the monitoring program in March 1993 and December 1993, respectively Dissolved hydrocarbons have been detected in monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-5 since monitoring began In March 1992, EA Engineering, Science and Technology (EA) observed removal of the oil-water separator/clanfier (EA, August 1992, Report No 80633 01) EA collected one soil sample from beneath the former oil-water separator and one sample from the concrete Analytical results from the soil samples indicated that oil and grease (quantified as total oil and grease) were present Concentrations of volatile organic compounds, seinivolatile organic compounds, and polychlorinated biphenyls were below detection limits Total metals were also below detection limits, with the exception of arsenic and barium, which were detected at concentrations of 0 0051 and 0 12 parts per mullion, respectively On March 2, 1992, RESNA conducted a vapor extraction test at the site (RESNA, June 15, 1992, Report No 30004-5) Results of the test indicated that soil beneath the site can be remediated by vapor extraction, and the evaluated radius of influence was 30 feet. In May 1994, RESNA submitted a problem assessment report ([RESNA, May 11, 1994, Report No 30004-8]) to the San Joaquin County Public Health Services and the Cahforrua Regional Water Quality Control Board A final remediation plan and subsequent remediation will be prepared and implemented in the future GROUNDWATER MONITORING: FOURTH QUARTER 1995 EMCON was contracted by ARCO to monitor groundwater monitoring wells previously installed at the site Field work included measuring depths to groundwater and collecting groundwater samples for subjective and laboratory analyses EMCON used these data to evaluate the gradient and direction of groundwater flow beneath the site On December 4, 1995, a technician from EMCON measured the depths to groundwater and collected groundwater samples from monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-6 for subjective and laboratory analyses The sampling and analysis procedures used are presented in Appendix A. The technician did not observe floating product or product sheen on samples collected from the wells (see Table 1) The surveyed elevations of the top of casing and the depth to groundwater measurements (summarized in Table 1) were used to evaluate the potentiometnc surface beneath the site . On December 4, 1995, the direction of groundwater flow was toward the east with a gradient of approximately 0 003 (see Figure 3) The direction of groundwater flow is SAON\PJMO"8051400 2DS-46mwpt l