Laserfiche WebLink
Supplemental Calculationsfir r Closure Review September 8, 2011 <br /> Former BP Station No. 11193 3202 West Hammer Lane, Stockton, CA <br /> located at least 40 feet up-gradient of the dispenser islands, a suspected source area, and Site <br /> investigations have not identified a source in the vicinity of the wells. The February 2011 <br /> concentrations are within the historical range, and the relatively non-mobile constituent is not <br /> expected to significantly migrate. Although concentrations of DRO have historically fluctuated <br /> in the shallow zone, shallow DRO concentrations have not significantly migrated, the impacts <br /> are localized and immobile, and the concentrations are adequately delineated by the current <br /> monitoring well network. While a decreasing concentration trend cannot be demonstrated for <br /> DRQ in all wells, including deep well MW-13, decreasing trends are evident in wells MW-3 and <br /> MW-7, and it is clear that the reported concentrations are well below concentrations considered <br /> low-risk by the SWRCB Task Force. A declining trend in surrounding wells for relatively non- <br /> mobile constituents such as DRO is considered to be evidence that the overall extent of the <br /> contaminant plume is shrinking. Insufficient data above the laboratory reporting limit (for <br /> shallow monitoring wells currently exceeding the water quality objective of 100 ug/L) is <br /> available to perform a regression analysis and predict a timeframe to reach water quality <br /> objectives for DRO. <br /> ESTIMATED MASS REMAINING <br /> The estimated residual masses of DRO and MTBE in soil were calculated using soil sample <br /> information obtained from historical Site investigation summaries and the San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department (SJCEHD), since no table of historical soil sample results was <br /> available. Three detections of DRO in soil have been reported. During a November 1994 <br /> investigation, DRO was reported in sample TPHIS-10 at a concentration of 1 milligram per <br /> kilogram (mg/kg), in sample TD-2 at a concentration of 7,600 mg/kg, and in sample TD-3 at a <br /> concentration of 3,400 mg/kg. For the purposes of the calculation, a 10-foot thick soil column <br /> was used, which represents the depth of a typical surface release (approximately 2 feet below <br /> ground surface [bgs]) down to the reported groundwater depth of 12 feet bgs). Closure <br /> Solutions has conservatively estimated the volume of impact to be 10 feet by 10 feet by 10 feet <br /> deep. The estimated residual mass of DRO in soil is approximately 1,331.12 pounds. Closure <br /> Solutions notes that the laboratory analytical report indicates that sample TPH1S-10 contained a <br /> lower boiling point hydrocarbon mixture, quantified as diesel, but the chromatogram did not <br /> match the typical diesel fingerprint, and samples TD-2 and TD-3 contained a mixture of diesel <br /> and lower boiling point hydrocarbons, quantified as diesel, but the chromatograms did not match <br /> the typical diesel fingerprint. Analytical data used to estimate the soil mass was collected nearly <br /> 17 years ago, and the estimated residual mass is likely much lower following nearly 17 years of <br /> natural attenuation. Calculations and assumptions are presented in Attachment A. <br /> 2 of 4 <br />