Laserfiche WebLink
Supplemental Calculations four Closure Review September 8, 2011 <br /> Former BP Station No. 11193 3202 West Hammer Lane,Stockton, CA <br /> Closure Solutions identified only one soil sample containing MTBE that was collected above the <br /> current water table for use in the residual mass calculation. To provide a more conservative <br /> estimate of residual MTBE mass in soil, the SJCEHD requested that six additional samples <br /> containing MTBE, which were collected beneath the former underground storage tanks (USTs) <br /> at 15 feet bgs be used in the calculation. Closure Solutions notes that these sample locations are <br /> currently below the water table by up to 4 feet. The residual mass calculation includes two <br /> discreet areas: one for soil within the vadose zone and one for soil beneath the water table. <br /> During facility upgrades conducted in December 1998, MTBE was reported in sample D-3, <br /> collected beneath a dispenser, at a concentration of 1.8 mg/kg. MTBE was also reported in six <br /> samples collected beneath the former USTs at concentrations of 74, 11, 40, 64, 80, and 11 <br /> mg/kg. <br /> t <br /> For the purposes of the calculation, it is assumed that sample D-3 was collected at 2 feet bgs, <br /> which represents the depth of a typical surface release and extended to groundwater <br /> (approximately 12 feet bgs). Closure Solutions has conservatively estimated the volume of <br /> impact to be 10 feet by 10 feet by 10 feet deep. For samples collected beneath the former USTs, <br /> Closure Solutions averaged the concentrations and conservatively estimated the volume of <br /> impact to be the lateral limits of the former UST excavation (estimated to be 25 by 38 feet) with <br /> a vertical thickness of 10 feet. <br /> The total estimated residual mass of MTBE in soil is approximately 53.92 pounds. Closure <br /> Solutions notes that the analytical data used to estimate the soil mass was collected nearly 13 <br /> years ago, and the estimated residual mass is likely much lower following nearly 13 years of <br /> natural attenuation. Calculations and assumptions are presented in Attachment A. <br /> To determine residual mass in groundwater, Closure Solutions assumed that the concentrations <br /> of DRO and MTBE detected in the groundwater samples collected during the February 2011 — <br /> monitoring event were representative of Site conditions. The accuracy of these calculations is <br /> based on the data available and the actual mass may be over represented or under represented. <br /> DRO was detected using silica gel cleanup in three wells (MW-9, MW-13, and VW-1) during <br /> the February 2011 monitoring event at an average concentration of 477 micrograms per liter <br /> (ug/L). The depth to water at the Site during the event was approximately 12 feet bgs and DRO <br /> was reported in deep well MW-13 which is screened down to 113 feet bgs. Therefore to be <br /> conservative, a water column of 101 feet was used in the calculation. Based on the assumptions <br /> of a 3,175 square foot area of impact, a vertical impact zone of 101 feet, and an assumed <br /> porosity of 30 percent; the estimated mass of DRO remaining in the dissolved phase is <br /> approximately 2.86 pounds (see attached calculations). <br /> As shown on Figure 4 in Stantee Consulting Corporations first quarter 2011 monitoring report, <br /> MTBE was detected in three wells during the February 2011 monitoring event at concentrations <br /> 3of4 <br />