Laserfiche WebLink
vicinity of the former USTs was estimated to be 26,000 pounds mass prior to SVE system <br /> operation, currently TPPH-g mass in the vicinity of the former USTs is estimated to be <br /> 4,000 pounds mass Based on these figures, a total reduction of TPPH-g mass of approxi- <br /> mately 85 percent was achieved during the time period between SVE system activation and <br /> the present Since SVE system operational data indicate that approximately 12,000 pounds of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons were removed by the SVE system, the remaining 10,000 pounds <br /> were removed as a result of natural attenuation processes The migration potential has there- <br /> fore been reduced by the reduction of total mass beneath the site This conclusion recognizes <br /> the TPPH-g mass influence on migration transport mechanisms <br /> As stated earlier, mass removal of petroleum hydrocarbons by the SVE system had reached an <br /> asymptotic condition when it was deactivated in November 1992 It is recognized that while <br /> SVE was an effective remediation technology which contributed considerably to the remedial <br /> effort at the site, there were environmental and system design factors that contributed to the <br /> decline of system effectiveness prior to achieving acceptable soil concentrations These <br /> factors are presented below <br /> • Vapor flow to the SVE wells is affected by frictional resistance along the <br /> well screen, the difference between horizontal and vertical soil permeability <br /> to air flow, and general variations in soil permeability to air flow Screen <br /> intervals for each of the SVE wells extend from 14 to 44 feet bgs, but <br /> because of frictional resistance along the well screen, most of the vapor <br /> flow occurs over the upper portion of the well screen Additionally, the <br /> effects of frictional resistance are compounded due to the fact that horizon- <br /> tal permeability to air flow is typically an order of magnitude greater the <br /> vertical permeability The two factors mentioned would cause mass <br /> removal to be localized near the top of the screen interval which is at 14 feet <br /> bgs Data suggest the greatest petroleum hydrocarbon impact currently <br /> occurs at the 25- to 30-foot bgs interval With respect to general variations <br /> in soil permeability to air flow, it is well known that the primary variable <br /> controlling in-situ remediation is soil permeability For SVE, local varia- <br /> tions in permeability create preferred flow channels which restrict direct <br /> contact between soil vapor flow and hydrocarbon impact In the end, soil <br /> permeability will dictate the pace and completeness of active remediation <br /> • Lower weight molecular components of gasoline volatilize more readily <br /> than the higher molecular weight components As a result, the volatilization <br /> rate of TPPH-g decreases with time even though hydrocarbon-impacted <br /> soils remain within the radius of influence of the SVE wells <br /> • <br /> 3201337B/CAP—AMD DOC 7 November 30, 1995 <br />