Laserfiche WebLink
t <br /> �Y protect the beneficial use with the most stringent numeric water quality standards will protect <br /> all other uses Below, site-specific water quality standards and goals are developed <br /> 3.1.1 Water Quality Protection Standards <br /> In general, water quality protection standards focus on protecting the existing water quality <br /> whenever that water quality is better than that required to protect all present and potential <br /> beneficial uses (Resolution 68-16) Numeric water quality standards based on Resolu- <br /> tion 68-16 are associated with the background levels, which in turn are subject to the reason- <br /> able limit of detection for the residual constituent of concern As indicated in Section 2 2 1, <br /> the constituents of concern are TPH-g and BTEX compounds Parameters mentioned in the <br /> Basin Plan that are not relevant to the development of water quality protection standards for <br /> the site are pH, electric conductivity, total dissolved solids, chloride, total petroleum hydro- <br /> carbons as kerosene, total oil and grease, metal contaminants, and volatile organics These <br /> parameters are either (1) not found beneath the site (i e , total oil and grease), (2) not asso- <br /> ciated with impact identified beneath the site (i e , pH, total dissolved solids), or (3) naturally <br /> occumng (i e , metals) Reasonable limits of detection for the residual target compounds <br /> found beneath the site are shown below <br /> Concentration <br /> (. Compound arts per billion <br /> Benzene 05 <br /> Toluene 05 <br /> Eth lbenene 05 <br /> Xylenes 05 <br /> TPH-g and TPH-d 50 <br /> Where groundwater degradation has occurred, Resolution 68-16 may not strictly apply This f <br /> is because the existing water quality within the residual plume boundary does not warrant <br /> protection, m other words, the residual plume water atiality is not better than that re <br /> qutred to <br /> protect all other beneficial water uses It seems reasonable to presume that protection, the <br /> o j ive o esolution 68-16, pertains only tow her ume <br /> boundary The ramification of this interpretation is that flow (or discharge) of groundwater <br /> across the residual plume boundary with residual concentrations greater than those identified <br /> above, is not consistent with Resolution 68-16 (or site water quality protection standards) <br /> Locating the exact position of the residual plume boundary is difficult, consequently, it is <br /> proposed that a compliance boundary be established The compliance boundary will encom- <br /> pass the residual plume, and allow for a reasonable downgradient attenuation zone The <br /> water quality standards will apply to groundwater outside the compliance boundary This <br /> feature is consistent with State and Regional Board policy regarding establishing a WQLZ in <br /> `.ie3201337BI1918REV 10 August 31, 1995- <br />