Laserfiche WebLink
• remedial objectives Additionally, monitoring will be will be used as a tool <br /> to manage the dissolved-hydrocarbon plume <br /> Institutional Control. This management technology will be used to reduce <br /> the possibility of exposure to petroleum hydrocarbon-affected media at, or <br /> from, the site Generally, this is accomplished by restricting access to <br /> impacted media For example, since impacted groundwater will persist for <br /> some time during remediation, use would be restricted by prolubitirig instal- <br /> lation of drinking water wells at, or near, the site Establishing a WQLZ is <br /> also an aspect of institutional control Finally, a compliance contingency <br /> plan will be prepared for implementation in the event dissolved hydrocarbon <br /> migration threatens site environmental goals (Section 3) <br /> 5.3.2 Alternative 1: Soil Excavation and Ott Site Disposal <br /> In addition to the common elements mentioned above, this alternative consists of soil excava- <br /> tion and proper off-site disposal After removing clean overburden, impacted sod would be <br /> excavated and trucked off site for disposal at an appropriate landfill Up to 4,000 cubic yards <br /> of soil would be excavated and some fraction transported to a landfill (space for on-site <br /> treatment is limited) Shoring may be required to prevent caving, and the excavation would <br /> . be limited by surrounding improvements <br /> The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) suggests that excavation with off- <br /> site landfill disposal should be considered for small soil volumes (less than 1,000 cubic yards) <br /> with high contaminant concentrations The benefits of this alternative are that it is easy to <br /> implement and implementation is rapid Limitations include contaminants are moved, not <br /> treated, the alternative is not cost-effective for large soil volumes or soil with low impact <br /> concentrations, and the alternative can pose long-term liability <br /> 5.3.3 Alternative 2: SVEBioventing <br /> This alternative consists of the following elements (1) design and installation of an <br /> SVFJbiovent system utilizing existing wells when possible, and (2) possible use of thermal <br /> oxidation or carbon adsorption(abatement unit)for treating system off gas <br /> Application of this alternative would require installation of an SVE/biovent system and possi- <br /> bly an abatement unit Air flow rates would be optimized to first enhance volatilization, then <br /> biodegradation Wells would be used to control flow regimes with an emphasis on air flow <br /> immediately within impacted soil volumes Operational flexibility is proposed as a means to <br /> address seasonal groundwater elevation changes and maximize biodegradation During peri- <br /> ods of high groundwater elevation, extraction flow rates will be decreased, and some SVE <br /> wells will be taken out of service These actions will maintain volatilization at the capillary <br /> 3201337B/1918REV 22 August 31, 1995 <br />