My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAZELTON
>
2025
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505804
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2020 5:51:48 PM
Creation date
1/31/2020 3:57:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0505804
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0007013
FACILITY_NAME
KOPPEL STOCKTON TERMINAL
STREET_NUMBER
2025
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HAZELTON
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2025 W HAZELTON AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
330
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Daisy Wei . - 2 - • 3 April 2012 - <br /> The soil data obtained in the former bagging plant area suggest that the soil buffering capacity <br /> has been consumed, resulting in acidic soils which may be resulting in aluminum toxicity, as the <br /> Root Zone Work Plan suggests. In our 15 March conversation, Ms. Wei proposed mixing <br /> agricultural lime with the trench backfill in order to raise the pH to about pH 6. In a 26 March <br /> telephone conversation with Ms. Wei, we agreed that the amount of agricultural lime shall not <br /> exceed 75 pounds per trench, as configured in the Root Zone Work Plan. <br /> Additional soil analyses that would assist Koppel in interpreting the soil condition include cation <br /> exchange capacity, and percent base saturation. The cation exchange capacity provides an <br /> estimate of the number of cationic exchange sites available on the soil surfaces, and the <br /> percent base saturation provides an analysis of what cations occupy what percentages of these <br /> exchange sites. Koppel should also obtain soil samples from a healthy area of the phyto- <br /> remediation planting (near normal pH) to analyze for soil pH buffering capacity, cation exchange <br /> capacity and percent base saturation. This data enables a site-specific standard of comparison, <br /> and it may indicate if other soil areas will be expected to also turn acidic in the near future. <br /> Cleanup Goals in Soil <br /> In our 15 March conversation, Ms. Wei referenced a cleanup goal for nitrogen in soil as <br /> 200 mg/kg for the sum of nitrate as nitrogen plus total Kjeldahl nitrogen. While this is the <br /> cleanup goal expressed in Central Valley Water Board staff's 16 May 1997 letter and reiterated <br /> in its 20 January 2000 Memorandum, Central Valley Water Board staff recognize that total <br /> Kjeldahl nitrogen is not a good indicator of a pending nitrogen impact to groundwater. Instead, <br /> the 200 mg/kg goal for nitrogen sources in soil should be the sum of nitrate as nitrogen and <br /> ammonium. <br /> Ammonium Treatment in Soil <br /> Koppel may wish to consider spot treatments of ammonium in soil. Some treatments that have <br /> been successful at other locations include incorporating woody mulch into the soil. The woody <br /> material provides a carbon source for microbial degradation, and the microbes obtain their <br /> nitrogen requirements from the soil ammonium. Application of humic acids may be another <br /> means of promoting microbial degradation of ammonium. <br /> Monitoring Wells <br /> Several of Koppel's monitoring wells are on Port of Stockton property and occasionally have <br /> been difficult to locate due to overburden. Of these wells, Koppel may wish to consider <br /> destroying monitoring wells MW-8S, MW-7S and MW-7D. These wells are no longer needed to <br /> define the extent of the pollution or measure upgradient concentrations. Monitoring wells <br /> MW-9S and MW-12S now provide that function. <br /> If Koppel wishes to destroy MW-8S, MW-7S and MW-7D, it must provide a work plan to Central <br /> Valley Water Board staff for concurrence. Meanwhile, Koppel plans to install flexible stakes to <br /> identify the locations of these wells for future monitoring events. Central Valley Water Board <br /> staff concur with this interim measure.. <br /> Aquifer Test <br /> The Root Zone Work Plan proposes an aquifer test at monitoring well KP-3. In our 15 March <br /> 2012 discussion, Ms. Wei proposed that the aquifer test is to determine if the aquifer could not <br /> provide a sustained yield of 200 gallons a day. This threshold is identified in the Basin Plan as <br /> one of the criteria that could lead to the Central Valley Water Board removing a groundwater <br /> basin from the beneficial use designation of being suitable for municipal or domestic uses. The <br /> process to present a proposal to the Central Valley Water Board to consider delisting a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.