Laserfiche WebLink
Services of P ead Data Central, Ina <br /> PAGE Z4 <br />{ 1991 WS App. LEXIS 30 33, x•59 ' <br /> i <br /> trial judge on remand the question of whether plaintiffs' total damages ;*603 ' <br /> fore the physical taking -- including damages for both the- property taken and the <br /> injury to retained land __ constitute a complete remedy, thus obviating the need <br /> for determining whether a regulatory taking also may have occurred. .. <br /> R <br /> c E <br /> f n S See generally Kendall VPl.ager, Severance damage in Eminent Domain <br />[ Proceedings, 10 U ;flAk L. Rev;* I t19 1 . <br /> ii _ . <br /> End Footnotes- .. .. - - _ .. <br /> tONCLUSION <br /> The disifi5sal sanction agatiAst plaintiffs is reversed. The grant of partial <br /> summary Judgment in favor of the Government on the question of California's role <br /> is also reversed. Thi denial of plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on the <br /> questa a takini #3y physical occupancy is reversed; summary yjudgment for <br /> pl�ititfs on <br /> that motion is ordered. The case is remanded tp the Claims Cnurt <br /> f> r, turther procsse+dinaS consistent with this opinion. <br /> 10OS S <br /> Dosis are awarded fo appellants Hendler et al, <br /> u y <br /> AFIRt�EI1-INV oP t'F, fktEyER5EI-��t-PA�tT`� AND REMANDED. <br /> .. i21 <br /> 1. <br /> " tf ]{' <br /> t fF: <br />{ •t .fit: .' <br /> 4 s ;€` ti <br /> ! I <br /> LEXIS <br /> N9= <br />