My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARNEY
>
5400
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545276
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2020 9:46:24 AM
Creation date
1/31/2020 4:49:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545276
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0004997
FACILITY_NAME
PLUG CONNECTION LLC
STREET_NUMBER
5400
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARNEY
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
06106019
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
5400 E HARNEY LN
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 collected from boring DH-2 at a depth of approximately 90 feet <br /> 2 below grade. No contaminates (BTEX or TPHd) were detected in <br /> 3 this sample.: <br /> 4 6. Third Request For Groundwater gamplina Can May 22, <br /> 5 1991 SG&D resampled MW-1. The groundwater sample was collected <br /> 6 from at a depth of approximately 75 feet and contained only a <br /> 7 trace concentration (0.0006 ppm) of toluene. Such Level of <br /> 8 toluene is well below the action level for toluene (0.-1 ppm) and <br /> 9 has been found in many other cases to be naturally occurring at <br /> 10 such levels (or associated with adhesive tape used to seal sample <br /> 11 containers, or other lab contamination) . No other compound <br /> 12 (i.e. , the benzene, ethyl benzene, total xylenes, or TPHd) was <br /> 13 detected in the groundwater sample taken from MW-I (at the <br /> 14 laboratory detection limit for TPHd of 0.05 ppm and for all <br /> 15 others of 0.0005 ppm) . <br /> 16 7. Based on the forgoing data and our experience in these <br /> 1.7 types of cases, it is our opinion that: <br /> 18 a. There is no evidence that gasoline was ever <br /> 19 stored in the UST - - no TPH' as gasoline was detected in any soil <br /> 20 samples. <br /> 21 b. The lateral and vertical extent of petroleum- <br /> 22 affected soil in the vicinity of the UST has been adequately <br /> 23 assessed and the petroleum-affected soil in the vicinity of the <br /> 24 former UST was removed as required by the LUFT Guidelines. <br /> 25 C. The data indicates that the UST did not adversely <br /> 26 impact the groundwater at the site. The groundwater samples <br /> 27 taken in the immediate vicinity of the tank did not reveal any <br /> 28 contamination of concern and other groundwater samples reveal <br /> -5- VMMOLORSPNOHNSONMEC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.