My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003766
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAZELTON
>
375
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0540905
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003766
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2020 10:15:39 AM
Creation date
2/3/2020 9:08:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0003766
RECORD_ID
PR0540905
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0023406
FACILITY_NAME
SIERRA LUMBER MANUFACTURERS
STREET_NUMBER
375
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HAZELTON
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
147120808
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
375 W HAZELTON AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' 24 August 2001 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 98-0448 <br />' Page 6 of 7 <br />' 4.4. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> The implications from the April 2001 ground water monitoring event are as follows <br /> • Ground water flow direction at the site was generally toward the south-southwest at a <br /> gradient of 0 015 ft/ft or less, due to the low gradient at the site, slight vanations in ground <br />' water measurements or changes of recharge/discharge of the local ground water could greatly <br /> modify the inferred ground water flow direction <br />' • The increase of ground water elevation of approximately 0 56 feet between January 2001 and <br /> April 2001 is probably due to seasonal fluctuation <br /> • The ground water elevation at the site was reasonably within the screened intervals of wells <br />' MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-4A, MW-5, MW-6, MW-7 and MW-8 and should be <br /> representative of shallow ground water conditions,however well MW-4B is"drowned"with <br /> water approximately 25 feet over the screen and yields a sample more representative of <br />' deeper ground water conditions <br /> • Ground water elevation data collected on 23 April 2001 was inconclusive regarding potential <br /> • water mounding due to alar sparging at the site <br /> • The elevated concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons detected in samples collected from <br />' wells MW-1,MW-2, MW-4A and MW-4B indicate that these wells are within the dissolved <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon "core area" of the plume (Figures 4) <br /> • Previous and current analytical results from ground water samples suggest that there is a <br /> minor MTBE, DIPE and TBA-impact to ground water in the areas of wells MW-3 and MW- <br /> 4 (Table 2) <br /> • Laboratory results of ground water samples collected from MW-4B (screened 45 to 50 feet <br /> bsg) suggest that the dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon plume extends to at least 50 feet bsg, <br /> and is at least 30 feet thick <br /> Based on SVE remediation data collected between 16 April 2001 (start-up) and 30 June 2001, AGE <br /> concludes <br /> • The volume of hydrocarbons extracted by the SVE system was calculated to be <br /> approximately 677 65 pounds, or approximately 108 4 gallons of petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> extracted (Appendix F) during the second quarter 2001 monitoring period <br /> • The average SVE inlet flow rate was 40 cubic feet per minute(cf n) at an average differential <br /> Ipressure of 0 55 inches of water (Table 5) <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.