Laserfiche WebLink
Harding Lawson Associates <br /> April 5, 1994 <br /> 276901 <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Mr Harlin Knoll <br /> Page 3 <br /> HLAs proposed field investigation presented below is intended to be generally consistent with the <br /> requirements of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) for investigation of <br /> USTs HLAs field program has been designed to allow coverage of a larger area to evaluate the <br /> distribution of potential groundwater contaminants while m unizang the number of permanent <br /> monitoring wells to be installed Prior to drilling HLA will obtain the appropriate perrmts from the <br /> SJCEHD This field investigation is broken clown into four tasks presented below <br /> Task 1 - Site A and B field investigation <br /> Task 2 - Oil Bunker Investigation <br /> Task 3 - Analytical Program <br /> Task 4 - Prepare report of findings and a closure plan <br /> A detailed description of each task is presented below <br /> Task 1 - Site A and Site B Investigation <br /> • Analytical testing of the groundwater sample from the Site A tank pit indicates the presence of an <br /> existing groundwater contamination problem At Site B, groundwater has not been tested but soil <br /> contamination is present HLAs approach is to evaluate the groundwater conditions an the vicinity of <br /> the Sites A and B excavation to assess the presence of groundwater contamination To accomplish <br /> this, HLA proposes to qualitatively assess groundwater contamination by conducting a survey using a <br /> soil gas rig followed by the installation of two wells The soil gas rig will collect groundwater samples <br /> by using a steel probe pushed into the soils below the water table A sample of the groundwater is <br /> collected and placed in a 40 milliliter VOA vial and an analysis of the headspace is conducted to <br /> screen for the presence of total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-G), a benzene, toluene, <br /> ethylbenzene, and xylenes HLA wall use Tracer Research to conduct the work HLA proposes 1 day <br /> of soil gas work to evaluate both sites Based on discussions with Tracer regarding site conditions, it is <br /> estimated that 8 to 12 points can be sampled in one day (4 to 6 at each site) <br /> Based on the results of the survey, the two monitoring wells can be effectively located to confirm the <br /> results of the survey This method has several advantages including reducing the number of wells <br /> required for plume definition, and allow for quicker assessment of the plume If based on the soil gas <br /> survey, additional wells are required, HLA will provide HSC and the RWQCB with our <br /> recommendations <br /> After completion of the groundwater survey, HLA will drill two groundwater monitoring wells down <br /> gradient of the former UST locations Actual locations will be based on the groundwater survey <br /> results Groundwater flow direction is estimated to be to the north (San Joaquin County Flood Control <br /> and Water Conservation District, Fall 1989) The wells will be drilled to a depth of approximately 20 <br /> feet BGS using hollow stem auger drilling equipment The wells will be constructed of 2-inch <br /> diameter PVC casing with 10 feet of screen The annular space will be filled with clean water washed <br /> sand up to 2 feet above the top of the screen Two feet of bentonite pellets will be place above the <br /> screened interval Cernent/bentomte grout will be place in the remaining portion of the borehole At <br />