WORK PLANS - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

�r On July 9, 1992, Resna published Summary Report—Assessment of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Contamination of the Groundwater, which documented the installation and sampling of two additional groundwater monitoring wells (MW-2 and MW-3). The monitoring well locations are shown on Figures 2 and 3, the soil sample analytical results are summarized in Table 1, the well construction details are summarized in Table 2, and the groundwater analytical results are included in Table 3. From May 8, 1992 to April 27, 1994, the three monitoring wells were monitored and sampled on three different occasions. In general, the concentrations of gasoline hydrocarbons in these wells declined; However, by April 27, 1994, the static groundwater level had risen �. above the tops of the screen intervals in all three wells. The well construction and groundwater monitoring data are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. On July 8, 1994, Resna published Summary Report/Additional Groundwater Investigation. This report documented the installation of two additional groundwater monitoring wells (MW-4 and MW-5). Gasoline hydrocarbons were not detected in groundwater collected from these two new wells. The monitoring well locations are shown on Figures 3, the soil sample �.+ analytical results are summarized in Table 1, the well construction details are summarized in Table 2, and the groundwater analytical results are included in Table 3. 1.2.3 Remediation of Source Area On June 29, 1995, Groundwater Technology, Inc. (GTI) published Environmental Assessment Report, documenting the installation of two vapor extraction well nests (VW-1 and VW-2) and two single vapor extraction wells (VW-3 and VW-4), and the pilot testing and �... modeling of soil vapor extraction. The well locations are shown on Figure 2, and the soil sample analytical results are summarized in Table 1. Based on these findings GTI recommended that the site be remediated by soil vapor extraction plus air sparging from MW-1. GTI did not implement their recommendation. L On May 20, 1998, Ramage Environmental published Problem Assessment Report and .. Corrective Action Plan (PAR-CAP)for the site. Ramage Environmental confirmed soil vapor �., extraction (SVE) and air sparging as the most efficient and practical remedial alternatives. The SVE system capture zones relative to the lateral extent of impacted soil is shown on Figure 5. � 5