Laserfiche WebLink
Environmental Assessment Report 4 <br /> San Joaquin Catholic Cemetery,Cemetery Lane and Harding Way Stockton,CA June 29, 19% <br /> extracted from two wells(VW-3 and VW-20) at three flow rates during three one-hour penods from <br /> each well and from the four other vapor extraction wells(VW-2S,VW-4,VW-1 S, and VW-1 D) for <br /> shorter penods (approximately 20 minutes) Wells VW-3 and VW-21)were tested at three different <br /> flow/vacuum levels to determine optimum flow rates for system design <br /> Extracted vapors removed by the vacuum pump were routed through an internal combustion unit(VR <br /> Systems model V3C) approved for treatment by the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollubon Control <br /> District Induced vacuum readings at the surrounding monitoring wells and VEWs, and applied <br /> vacuum, LEL, oxygen, and flow rate readings at the extraction point were collected during the test at 10 <br /> to 15 minute intervals Extracted vapor samples from each extraction point were collected in Tedlar <br /> bags when steady state pneumatic conditions had been attained at selected flow rates The extracted <br /> soil vapor samples were labeled, stored in an insulated container at ambient temperature, and <br /> submitted under a chain-of-custody manifest to a State-certified laboratory for analysis of BTEX and <br /> TPH-G In addition, one extracted vapor sample was analyzed for methane <br /> 42 Soil Vapor Extraction Test Results <br /> Measurements collected during the soil vapor extraction test on May 9, 1995 are summarized in <br /> Table 3 Flow rates obtained during testing ranged from 3 to 38 cfm at vacuums ranging from 34 to <br /> 106 inches of water During the tests on VW-3 and VW-2D, maximum mechanically achievable <br /> vacuum/flow could not be reached due to the high concentrations of hydrocarbons in the extracted <br /> vapors and the limitation of mass loading on the internal combustion and <br /> Radius of influence was calculated for wells VW-3,VW-2D and VW-2S Radius of influence was <br /> calculated by extrapolating the regression line calculated for log vacuum versus distance down to 0 1 <br /> inches of vacuum Graphs 1,2 and 3 are graphs of log vacuum versus distance for wells VW-3, <br /> VW-213 and VW-2S, respectively Radii of influence were 59, 32 and 75 feet for VW-3,VW-21D and <br /> VW-2S, respectively <br /> TPH-G concentrations in extracted vapor samples from VW-3 were 43,000 mg/m'after 27 minutes of <br /> continuous extraction, and 45,000 mg/m' after 125 minutes of continuous extraction Vapor samples <br /> collected from VW-2D had concentrations ranging from 46,000 mg/m'after 15 minutes of continuous <br /> extraction, and 21,000 mg/m'after 115 minutes of continuous extraction Methane concentrations were <br /> below method detection limits in the VW-38 The analytical results indicate a decline in TPH-G <br /> concentration in vapors pulled from VW-2 in the deep zone, and practically unchanged hydrocarbon <br /> vapor concentration in vapors extracted from the shallow zone by VW-3 <br /> Based on the concentration observed in vapor samples and achievable flow rates observed during <br /> testing on VW-3 and VW-2D, mass extraction rates would initially be as high as 70 pounds per day from <br /> the shallow zone near VW-3 and 30 pounds per day from the deep zone near VW-2D <br /> • SJCCEAR rpt(Mist 171 <br /> ❑�� GROUNDWATER <br /> ❑❑ TECHNOLACY <br />