My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002561
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARDING
>
1112
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545263
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0002561
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2020 6:55:44 PM
Creation date
2/3/2020 10:46:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0002561
RECORD_ID
PR0545263
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005108
FACILITY_NAME
EGGIMANS HYDRAULIC GARAGE
STREET_NUMBER
1112
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HARDING
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15102101
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1112 E HARDING WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.aCVVD <br /> ASS OCIATES I NC . <br /> In April 1999, at the request of PHS/EHD, ATC completed a receptor survey for the subject <br /> property. ATC reviewed PHSIEHD groundwater well construction logs, Department of Water <br /> Resources (DWR) groundwater well construction logs, and conducted a site walk in the vicinity <br /> of the site to identify any groundwater wells located within a 2,000-foot radius of the site. This <br /> survey revealed fourteen wells located within approximately 2,000 feet of the site. The closest <br /> of these wells is located approximately 800 feet upgradient of the project site. The receptor <br /> survey findings are summarized in ATC's Well Survey for Andrew and Edith Trust, for the <br /> Property at 1112 East Harding Way, Stockton, California,dated April 9, 1999. <br /> On April 11, 2000, a single soil boring (SB7) was advanced to approximately 65 ft. bgs to <br /> evaluate whether groundwater had been impacted at the subject site. Groundwater was initially <br /> encountered at approximately 45 feet bgs and a sample was subsequently collected from the soil <br /> boring using a Hydropunch® groundwater-sampling tool. In order to determine the vertical <br /> extent of contamination in the most cost-effective manner, the soil boring was further advanced <br /> to a total completion depth of 66.5 ft. bgs where field observations suggested the vertical extent <br /> of the petroleum hydrocarbons had been realized. Analytical results and field observations <br /> indicated that soil and groundwater beneath the location of the former USTs were impacted by <br /> residual petroleum hydrocarbon constituents. The vertical extent of impacted soil and <br /> groundwater appeared to be defined. However, the lateral extent of petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> constituents at or near the groundwater interface was undefined. Additional work to further <br /> characterize the extent of contamination was been requested PHSIEHD in correspondence dated <br /> September 20, 2000. <br /> On November 15 and 16, 2001, an ATC geologist supervised the advancement of three soil <br /> borings to approximately 54 to 55 feet bgs. Soil borings were then completed as groundwater <br /> monitoring wells MW 1, MW2, and MW3. The soil sample collected from boring MW2 at a <br /> depth of 35.5 feet bgs contained the highest concentrations of TPHg, ethyl benzene, and xylenes. <br /> The soil samples collected from boring MW2 at depths of 30 feet bgs and 55 feet bgs contained <br /> only trace concentrations of TPHg, ethyl benzene, and/or xylenes. The soil samples collected <br /> from borings MWl and MW3 at depths of 35 feet bgs contained trace concentrations of xylenes <br /> and TPHg, respectively. The samples collected from borings MW 1 and MW3 at depths of 40 <br /> feet bgs did not contain detectable concentrations of TPHg or BTEX. MTBE, TAME, TBA, <br /> ETBE, DIPE, 1,2-DCA, or EDB were not detected in any soil samples collected from borings <br /> MW1, MW2, and MW3, though the detection limits were elevated in the MW2 sample from <br /> 35.5 feet bgs due to the high concentrations of TPHg noted previously. <br /> SAMPLING ACTIVITIES <br /> On July 23, 2002, ATC personnel collected groundwater samples from monitoring wells MWI, <br /> MW2, and MW3. The locations of the monitoring wells are shown on Figure 2. Prior to j <br /> collection of groundwater samples, the depth to water, pH, electrical conductivity, and j <br /> temperature were measured in the monitoring wells and recorded. A minimum volume of three <br /> • well casings was purged from each well prior to sampling. The wells were allowed to recover <br /> and samples were collected from each well using disposable bailers. <br /> w:lwordpro%22493\Rcportsl3QR-02.doc 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.