Laserfiche WebLink
A S S 0 C I A T E S I N C <br /> The groundwater matrix samples collected from each well were submitted to State-certified <br /> Argon Laboratories (ELAP Cert. No. 2359) for chemical analysis of TPHg utilizing EPA method <br /> 8015 modified, and BTEX and oxygenate fuel additives including MTBE utilizing EPA method <br /> 8260. Groundwater well purge and sample logs are contained in Attachment 1. <br /> ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> The groundwater analytical results measured at monitoring wells MWI, MW2, and MW3 <br /> showed detectable concentrations of TPHg, BTEX, MTBE, TBA, and 1,2-DCA. <br /> The measured concentration of TPHg at MWI was 750 pg/L. Benzene was detected at 2.3 pg/L, <br /> toluene was detected at 1.0 µg/L, ethylbenzene was detected at 9.8 pg/L, and xylenes were <br /> detected at 26 pg/L. MTBE was detected at 13 pg/L, TBA at 35 µg/L., and 1,2-DCA at 18 µg/L. <br /> The measured concentration of TPHg at MW2 was 2,500 µg/L. Benzene was detected at 11 <br /> pg/L, toluene was detected at 49 pg/L, ethylbenzene was detected at 32 pg/L, and xylenes were <br /> detected at 56 gg/L. MTBE was detected at 110 pg/L, TBA at 130 µg/L, and 1,2-DCA at 92 <br /> Ag/L. <br /> The measured concentration of TPHg at MW I was 920 pg/L. Benzene was detected at 0.7 pg/L, <br /> • toluene was detected at 2.1 gg/L., ethylbenzene was detected at 5.2 gg/L, and xylenes were <br /> detected at 13 pg/L. MTBE was detected at 170 gg/L, TBA at 61 µg/L, and 1,2-DCA at 87 <br /> ply• <br /> The Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for benzene, 1 µg/L, was exceeded at monitoring <br /> wells MWI and MW2 which had detected concentrations of 2.3 Pg/L and 11 gg/L,. The MCL <br /> for MTBE, 13 pg/L, was exceeded at MWI, MW2, and MW3, which had detected <br /> concentrations of 13 pg/L, 110 gg/L, and 170 pg/L, respectively. <br /> GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION <br /> Water level measurements were collected from monitoring wells MWI, MW2, and MW3 on <br /> July 23, 2002. Water level elevations ranged from —24.05 to —24.16, representing an average <br /> increase in water table elevation of approximately 2.66 feet since April 2002. The water level <br /> data were used to develop the groundwater elevation contour map (Figure 3). Assuming that <br /> horizontal isotropic conditions prevail, groundwater in the uppermost aquifer beneath the site <br /> flowed towards the northeast. The average hydraulic gradient on July 23, 2002 was calculated to <br /> be 0.002 or approximately 9.4 ft/mile. A summary of groundwater monitoring data is presented <br /> in Table 1. <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> • Groundwater flow direction and gradient is consistent with previous sampling events. Water <br /> table elevations have increased since the April 2002 monitoring event. Groundwater analytical <br /> w:lwordpro1224931Reports\3QR-02.doc 3 <br />