Laserfiche WebLink
n <br /> FIELD INVESTIGATION <br /> To investigate the extent of residual soil contamination at the site, a total of six soil borings were <br /> advanced to depths ranging from approximately 16 to 31 feet below ground surface (bgs). All <br /> field activities were performed in accordance with Smith Technology's Workplan for Subsurface <br /> Investigation at 112 East Harding Way, Stockton, California, dated July 11, 1997. This <br /> workplan was approved by San Joaquin County Public Health Services, Environmental Health <br /> Division (PHS/EHD) on July 21, 1997. <br /> Soil Borings, Soil Sample Collection <br /> On July 24, 1997, a Smith Technology geologist supervised the advancement of six soil borings <br /> ranging in depth from 16 to 31 feet bgs. A site plan showing soil boring locations is included as <br /> Figure 2. Fisch Environmental, California Licensee C57 683865, advanced the borings using a <br /> truck mounted Geoprobe® narrow diameter rig employing direct push technology. Soil samples <br /> were described according to the Unified Soil Classification System. Descriptions of soil types <br /> encountered and sample collection intervals are presented on boring logs in Attachment 1. Soil <br /> samples were collected at five-foot intervals in acetate sampling tubes beginning at four feet <br /> below the ground surface. Each soil sample was field screened with a Photoionization Detector <br /> (PID) for the presence of volatile organic compounds. Sample tubes were immediately sealed at <br /> each end using Teflon tape and plastic end caps, labeled, and placed on ice pending laboratory <br /> analysis. Subsequent to sample collection, the soil borings were grouted to the surface with a <br /> neat cement grout. <br /> Selected soil samples were kept on ice and delivered under chain-of-custody documentation to <br /> State-certified NEI/GTEL Environmental Laboratories, Inc. for chemical analysis. <br /> Based on field observations (i.e. soil types and conditions, odor, discoloration) and discussions <br /> with facility personnel on site at the time of drilling, soil borings SB3, SB5 and S136 were placed <br /> in close proximity to the former UST pit location. Additionally, SB2 was positioned at the <br /> location of the former UST fuel dispenser. Borings SBI and S112 were placed within the <br /> excavated area of the former tanks. <br /> No obvious petroleum hydrocarbons were observed during field activities in the perimeter borings <br /> S132, SB3, SB5, and SB6. PID readings of collected soil samples did not exceed background <br /> levels of approximately 0 to 2 parts per million (ppm). However, obvious petroleum odor and <br /> elevated PID measurements were noted in soil samples collected from SBI and SB4 at depths <br /> ranging from 10 to 20 feet bgs and at 10 to 15 feet bgs, respectively. No obvious petroleum <br /> odors or elevated PID readings were noted in SBI at 30 feet bgs or S134 at 20 feet bgs, the <br /> deepest samples collected in the respective borings. An attempt was made to further advance the <br /> Geoprobe unit in several of the borings (including SB 1 and SB4), however probe refusal was <br /> encountered at depths ranging from 16 to 31 feet bgs due to the hardness of the formation. <br /> • w:1977361reportslsum.doc 2 <br /> • <br />