Laserfiche WebLink
Ms Margaret Lagono,SJCPHS September 28,2004 <br /> i Dual Phase Extraction Test Report <br /> Joe's Truck Plaza,Lathrop,California <br /> Page 7 <br /> DPE Test Analysis <br /> The induced vacuum and drawdown data collected were evaluated in relation to the <br /> applied vacuum to estimate radius of influence (ROI) The effective ROI has been <br /> defined as the radial distance from a vapor extraction well at which recorded vacuum <br /> Ievels suggest that subsurface air flow occurs and is presumed to be sufficient for <br /> remediation (P C Johnson et al, 1990) For the purpose of this test, the soil vapor ROI is <br /> defined as the distance from the well at which I percent of the applied wellhead vacuum <br /> occurs, and the groundwater ROI is identified as the distance at which a minimum of <br /> 2 percent drawdown is observed compared to drawdown in the extraction well <br /> DPE Test Results <br /> Field data collected from extraction well MW-7 and from the observation wells are <br /> summarized in Tables 1 through 4 and a summary of the test results are presented below <br /> • The applied wellhead vacuum during the test ranged from 23 to 27 5 inches Hg <br /> (or approximately 312 8 to 374 inches WC), with influent soil vapor flow rates in <br /> • the range of 86 to 88 cubic feet per minute (cfm), and an average groundwater <br /> extraction rate of 7 2 gallons per minute (gpm) <br /> • Induced vacuum in the range of 0 inches WC to 0 04 inches WC was observed in <br /> only one well (MW-2), located approximately 30 feet from well MW-7 These <br /> induced vacuum observations are less than 1% of applied wellhead vacuum <br /> • The maximum groundwater drawdown in all the observation wells during the test <br /> was in the range of 0 15 to 0 37 feet The highest decrease in groundwater <br /> elevation was observed in well MWO-1X, located approximately 30 feet from <br /> well MW-7 Figure 3 illustrates the drawdown with time at the observation wells <br /> during the DPE test Greater than 2 percent drawdown was observed in wells <br /> MWO-1X and MW-2 <br /> • The influent soil vapor concentrations of MTBE were reported at 17 milligrams <br /> per cubic meter (mg/m)(June 15, 2004) and 2 9 mg/m3 (June 16, 2004) TPHG <br /> was reported at 14 mg/m3 in the influent air sample collected on June 16, 2004, <br /> while benzene was not reported any of the samples collected on June 15 and 16, <br /> 2004 (Table 2) <br /> • The influent groundwater concentrations of MTBE were reported at 90 µg/L <br /> (June 14, 2004) and 96 µg/L (June 16, 2004) TPHG or benzene were not <br /> reported in the influent groundwater samples collected June 14 and June 16, 2004 <br /> (Table 3) <br /> P Woe s Truck Plaza\Reports\DPE Testlloes Truck DPE Test Report doc 5 7-RA rus <br />