Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> Interim Remedial Action - 2- • 19 March 1999 <br /> Nestle Beverage Company <br /> To meet these objectives Nestle proposed, during this meeting, one additional extraction well <br /> (E-3) located (approximately) between the M-5 monitoring well cluster and the municipal water <br /> supply well MW-7. The purpose of this additional extraction well (E-3) is to provide hydraulic <br /> control of the TCE plume and also prevent additional impacts to the MW-7 supply well which. _. <br /> has detected TCE (April 1998-1.8 ppb). As was agreed, an extraction well in this area will be <br /> constructed and operational no later than 3 June 1999. To assure that extraction well E-3 is <br /> constructed and operational by 3 June 1999, we request that Nestle submit an additional <br /> installation Work Plan for E-3 no later than 15 April 1999. <br /> 3. Based on the 1 I March 1999 meeting and earlier conversations with your consultant, IT <br /> Corporation, remediation of the TCE plume near municipal well MW-7, must be closely <br /> coordinated with the investigation and remediation of MTBE contaminated groundwater that <br /> appears to be associated with a Shell Gasoline Station located at 341 East Main Street, Ripon <br /> California. Site investigation data for the Shell Station provided by the San Joaquin County <br /> Public Health Services on 18 March 1999, indicate MTBE concentrations ranging from 141 4g/1 <br /> ems¢ —a to 3010 µg/l in groundwater. Plume maps provided by Nestle, detections of TCE in one <br /> domestic supply well located on 233 Parallel Avenue,(Ripon California) and detection of TCE <br /> IYItGt l Up=/x in municipal supply well MW-7 suggest that Nestle's TCE plume is in proximity to the MTBE <br /> groundwater plume associated with the Shell Station. Construction of an extraction well in this <br /> area must be designed in such manner that it will not exacerbate the MTBE groundwater plume. <br /> Svi'S urAa.R A6�S u�,taa �iR u�J�� baun n ,b Z. 3 <br /> 4. It was discussed, during the 11 March INWproject meeting, that an additional extraction well <br /> (E-4) could be placed on the southeast boundary of the facility(approximately between <br /> monitoring wells M-2 and M-12). The purpose of this extraction well is to provide hydraulic <br /> r containment of the TCE plume in this area and prevent further impacts to municipal supply well <br /> MW-9. Further evaluation of an extraction well southeast of the facility (either on or off-site of <br /> the Nestle property) should be conducted after additional plume definition is provided in this <br /> area. Specifically,Nestle will determine the extent of the TCE plume based on analytical data <br /> obtained from the Simpson wells. After this information becomes available,Nestle should be <br /> able to determine an optimal location to provide groundwater remediation in this area and <br /> provide containment of the TCE plume migrating towards municipal well MW-9. We request <br /> that Nestle provide proposals for additional extraction well(s) (i.e. E-4) no later than 15 June <br /> 1999 which would provide plume capture southeast of the facility. <br /> 5. The design specifications for the proposed GAC system (for extraction well E-2) provided in the <br /> Work Plan indicates that flow rates of up to 250 gpm could be treated by this system. Nestle <br /> should evaluate if additional extraction wells could be installed (near monitoring well cluster M- <br /> 8) or if greater flows can be extracted from extraction well E-2, to provide greater hydraulic <br /> control of the TCE plume in this area. An evaluation to determine optimal location for additional <br /> extraction well locations should be conducted as part of the pre-design activities. This evaluation <br /> should be presented in the installation work plan, discussed above, for extraction well <br /> E-3. <br />