My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003164
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HUNTER
>
819
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0522087
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003164
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2020 9:14:11 AM
Creation date
2/6/2020 8:18:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0003164
RECORD_ID
PR0522087
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0015049
FACILITY_NAME
UNIFIRST CORP
STREET_NUMBER
819
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
HUNTER
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
819 N HUNTER
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
311
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' first groundwater was encountered during drilling Careful measurements were taken in <br /> i <br />' the field to ensure proper pump positioning The submersible pump was lowered very <br /> gently through the water column to minimize disturbance of the water column Once the <br /> pump was set at the target depth, it was secured along with the discharge tubing to ensure <br />' that it did not move during purging <br />' The discharge tubing was connected to a Honba U-22-10 flow-through cell The flow- <br /> through cell was equipped with probes to monitor temperature, specific conductivity, pH, <br /> oxidation/ reduction potential (ORP), dissolved oxygen (DO), and turbidity Once <br />' purging was commenced, depth to groundwater was monitored to ensure the pump <br /> discharge rate produced a minimal drawdown of the water column Additionally, the <br />' parameters listed above were monitored and recorded on well purging forms along with <br /> the initial water level readings Copies of these forms are included in Appendix D of this <br />' report <br /> When parameters had sufficiently stabilized, a groundwater sample was collected <br />' Groundwater samples were collected directly from the discharge tubing from the pump <br /> into laboratory supplied glassware Samples for metals analyses were filtered in the field <br />' using a 0 45-micron inline filter Samples were labeled with the project name, date, time <br /> of sample collection, sample identification number, and then stored in an iced cooler <br />' prior to transport to the analytical laboratory Sample chain of custody protocol was <br /> followed from the time of sample collection until receipt by the laboratory STL of <br /> Pleasanton, California analyzed the groundwater samples STL is a California DHS <br /> certified laboratory <br /> 1 Due to a miscommunication with the laboratory, additional glassware for the collection <br /> of a duplicate sample and a trip blank were not provided As such these samples were not <br /> collected or submitted to the laboratory for analysis during this first quarter sampling <br />' event but will be submitted during all subsequent quarterly sampling events <br />' 4.3.1 Equipment Decontamination <br /> Prior to commencing purging and sampling episodes, all non-dedicated equipment used <br />' to purge the wells was thoroughly cleaned using a dilute solution of phosphate free <br /> detergent This included any non-dedicated equipment such as the submersible pump and <br />' flow through cell chamber <br />' 7 V\Goodwin ProctorWinalReport doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.