Laserfiche WebLink
CUARTERLY GRIGUN6 WATER MOMTORING REPORT <br /> ata W.Kettleman,[AGI,"ifornla <br /> For a complete site history, a description of site conditions, regional and local geology, <br /> hydrology, a description of subsurface conditions, a summarization of analytical results <br /> related to previous investigation and a further definition of the term"thief port"please refer <br /> to Aegis Site Assessment-Monitbring Well Installation Results Report,"dated March 26, <br /> 1991 and"Pre-Tank Replacement Site Assessment Results Report,"dated October 1989. <br /> 3.0 QUARTERLY MONITORING RESULTS <br /> 3.1 Groundwater Level Measurement <br /> Data obtained during the January 1991 monthly water level measurements is summarized <br /> in Table 1. This information includes the date, depth to groundwater measurement, <br /> reference elevation at the top of the well casing and the groundwater elevation for the <br /> three on site wells. Each measurement was made from the top of the well casing with <br /> a Seattle Slope Indicator and referenced to sea level. A groundwater gradient and flow <br /> direction for the subiect site was established based upon the groundwater elevations <br /> derived from the field measurements. The groundwater flows direction has been <br /> established in a southeasterly direction as shown on the ground-water table contour map <br /> (Figure 2). The groundwater gradient was measured as 0.0014 ft/ft. Refer to Regis' <br /> Standard Operating Procedures (SOP), in Appendix B number 12 for protocol relating to <br /> field measurements. <br /> 3.2 Groundwater Sam le Collection and Labpra!2CLAnalysis <br /> - The groundwater samples were collected on January 16, 1991. The three monitoring <br /> wells were purged and groundwater samples were collected according to the Aegis' <br /> standard operating procedure (SOP-7)included l,n the attachments. The field data sheets <br /> are included in Appendix C. The water samples from eanh well were collected in 40-m1 <br /> VOA vials and one-liter glass-amber bottles. The samples were immediately placed on <br /> ice in a cooler and delivered under chain-of-custody to Coast-to-Coast Analytical Services <br /> -- (CCAS) in San Luis Obispo, California. <br /> The water samples for MW-1, 2, a au 3 were analyzed for fuel fingerprint which includes: <br /> ^� a) total purgeable petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (f"PPH-G); b) benzene, <br /> ethylbenzene, toluene, and total xylenes (BTEX); c) 1,2-Dbromoethane (EDB); d) 1,2- <br /> Dichloroethane (EDC) and e) total lead. The laboratory analyses is as follows: the Fuel <br /> Fingerprint Analysis by extraction with EPA method 5030 (purge and trap) and analyzed <br /> by CAL DHS DRAFT TPH (modified) and EPA method 8240 (GC/MS)for,constituents a) - - - - <br /> 09.0138.RPT — 2 — <br />