Laserfiche WebLink
Y r <br /> E ' 02 September 1999 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 98-0468 - <br /> Page 2 of 4 , <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPH-d) by EPA Method 8015 Modified. <br /> ' Total petroleum hydrocarbons as.easoline TPH-Q by EPA Method 8015 Modified, ' <br /> ' Benzene. toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX) by EPA,Method8020;and <br /> • Fuel oxygenating compounds including di-isopropyl ether (DIPS), ethyl tertiary-butyl ether <br /> (ETBE), methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE), avid tertiary-butanol,(TBA). <br /> Chain-of-custody protocols were used to document sample custody transfers.from,the field to the <br /> ' analytical laboratory". Sample -ch,ain-of-custody forms and laboratory reports are pro-vided in <br /> Appendix C. <br /> 3.0. GROUNDWATER ELEVATION, FLOW DIRECTION AND GRADIENT <br /> ' Ground water monitoring activities included collection of ground water elevation measurements <br /> `from site muni€orin2 ,yells MN%1-I through TON1 `=5 (Figure 2): Measurement of depth to ground \\�ater <br /> -was performed prior to conducting ground'\vater purging-and sampling procedures at the site. A <br /> summary of depth to around v.-ater and ground water ele'ivation measurements is presented in Table 1. <br /> �.1. GROUND NATER ELEVATION <br /> ' During the August 1999 monitoring eve:lt, tl�e depth to around water at the.site fanged from 9.57 to <br /> 10.25 feet below top of well casings (btoc) (Table 1). Ground water elevation at the site ranged from <br /> ?.68.to3.17 feet below mean sea level (1\4SL) in well 1�- W� 3-and 411V--1, respectively (Table 1). <br /> ' . Ground water elevation in the monitoring wells decreased an average of 2..07 feet from the previous <br /> monitoring everlt (May 1999). <br /> 3.2. GROU-ND NATER FL01V AND GRADIENT <br /> A n'round water elevation contourmap for August1999 is illustrated on Figure '), Based on ground <br /> water elevation data, ground water flow direction is inferred 'to be to the north-northeast. Ground <br /> water.gradient for May 1999 was calculated-to be 0.0096. In general, ground water flow direction <br /> and gradient for August 1.999 appear to be consistent with previous monitoring events results. <br /> .4di-at?ced Cci,FnN'irunmcntal.Inc. <br />