Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> ,I <br /> i I I <br /> Project No 58080-06-02 <br /> May 5, 1995 <br />' range petroleum hydrocarbons in soil beneath the site and a discussion of the possible sources of <br /> groundwater impacts <br />' Data indicates the existence of a plume of residual benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes <br /> (BTEX) and petroleum hydrocarbons in vadose zone soil beneath the site The remaining BTEX <br /> plume exists beneath approximately 30%of the site and the remaining petroleum hydrocarbon plume <br />' exists beneath approximately 55% of the site <br /> Based on an average combined BTEX concentration of 50 mg/kg in soil, it is estimated that <br /> approximately 168 pounds of BTEX mass exists beneath the site Assuming an average petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon concentration in soil of 1,600 mg/kg, it is estimated that approximately 9,000 pounds <br /> of petroleum hydrocarbons remain in soil beneath the site The estimated vertical limits of BTEX <br /> and petroleum hydrocarbon migration range from approximately 25 to 45 feet below ground surface <br /> (bgs) and the depth to groundwater beneath the site between June 1992 and November 1994 ranged <br /> from approximately 54 to 57 feet bgs <br />' Petroleum hydrocarbons, VOCs and/or MTBE are present in onsite groundwater monitoring wells <br /> and in upgradient and crossgradient offsite wells at similar concentrations Monitoring well MW-5 <br /> is located upgradient and north of the subject site adjacent to an existing independent Exxon service <br /> station In November 1994, detectable MTBE concentrations in onsite wells ranged from 76 to 270 <br /> ug/L while the concentration of MTBE in MW-5 was 610 ug/L Onsite well MW-2, which is the <br /> furthest downgradient onsite well,and is located closest to the deepest onsite impacted soil contained <br />' only trace concentrations (2 ug/L or less) of VOCs, with no detectable petroleum hydrocarbons or <br /> MTBE <br />' The above evaluations of groundwater quality data combined with the vadose zone petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon plume configuration suggest that hydrocarbon releases from former USTs operated at <br /> the site have not impacted the underlying groundwater The aerial extent of dissolved petroleum <br />' hydrocarbons and VOCs in groundwater beneath and beyond the site as well as the detection of <br /> MTBE in onsite and offsite groundwater suggest the source of groundwater impacts are from offsite <br /> locations MTBE is a motor vehicle fuel additive introduced into Northern California only after the <br />' removal of the USTs at the subject site <br /> 1 <br /> A vapor extraction pilot test performed by Geocon indicates that soil vapor extraction is a feasible <br />' technology for the remediation of BTEX and petroleum hydrocarbon impacted soil beneath the site <br /> The use of other soil remediation technologies, as discussed in this PAR, are either not technically <br /> feasible or are cost prohibitive Test data indicates that an effective radius of influence greater than <br />' 50 feet can be achieved using the existing onsite vapor extraction wells and that the vacuum <br /> distribution for a properly engineered soil VES will encompass the portions of the plume targeted <br /> for remediation <br /> -2- <br />