My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003138
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
I
>
INDUSTRIAL
>
212
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545309
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003138
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2020 10:22:19 PM
Creation date
2/11/2020 9:13:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0003138
RECORD_ID
PR0545309
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0010339
FACILITY_NAME
H&H ENGINEERING CONST INC
STREET_NUMBER
212
STREET_NAME
INDUSTRIAL
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206-3920
APN
17728019
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
212 INDUSTRIAL DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
KI FINFELDER <br /> 6 SEMI-ANNUAL GROUNDWATER SAMPLING <br />' 6.1 MEASUREMENT OF WATER LEVELS <br />' In order to assess the groundwater gradient at the time of sampling, water level measurements <br /> were made in each monitoring well at the beginning of the sampling round, prior to purging and <br /> sampling the wells The depth-to-water was measured in each well according to the protocol <br />' described in Appendix A, Section A4 1 The depth-to-water measurements were then converted <br /> to relative groundwater elevations with respect to mean sea level or a local benchmark by <br /> subtracting them from the surveyed casing elevations <br />' The resulting groundwater elevations were calculated to assess the direction of the groundwater <br /> gradient at the time of sampling This inform.-tion was then used to evaluate which wells <br /> ' represent upgradient and which wells represent downgradient groundwater conditions <br /> Water levels were measured on July 7, 2000 prior to purging and sample collection of monitoring <br /> wells at the subject site Groundwater flow on this date was approximately to the northeast at a <br /> gradient of 0 005 ft/ft Past groundwater surveys have shown that groundwater flow direction <br /> and gradient is relatively consistent Groundwater gradients have ranged from 0 004 to 0 010 <br /> ft/ft For a summary of past groundwater elevations and associated data please refer to Table 3 <br /> Pumping influences and seasonal groundwater fluctuations may also affect groundwater flow and <br /> ' gradients <br /> 6.2 COLLECTION OF GROUNDWATER SAMPLES <br /> ' A total of 3oundwater les were collected on July 7, 2000 The 3 groundwater samples <br /> �' samples <br /> were collected from monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3 (see Plate 1) The wells were <br /> ' purged and sampled using disposable bailers as generally described in Appendix A Copies of <br /> the monitoring well sampling logs are included in Appendix C <br /> ' Purge water from the monitoring wells was stored on site in labeled 55-gallon drums pending <br /> chemical analysis and disposal by the client The drums were stored at the site In the yard area <br /> 6.3 SAMPLE HANDLING <br /> ' After collection, the groundwater samples were labeled, logged on a chain-of-custody form, and <br /> immediately stored in an iced cooler The samples were transported under chain-of-custody <br /> control to Kleinfelder's office and then transported by couner in a chilled ice chest to APPL <br /> Laboratories APPL is certified by the California Department of Health Services (DHS) to <br /> c perform the requested analyses <br /> 20-4439-01 E01/2000R726 Page 10 of 17 <br /> Copynght 2000 Kleinfelder Inc October 16,2000 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.