My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003138
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
I
>
INDUSTRIAL
>
212
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545309
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003138
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2020 10:22:19 PM
Creation date
2/11/2020 9:13:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0003138
RECORD_ID
PR0545309
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0010339
FACILITY_NAME
H&H ENGINEERING CONST INC
STREET_NUMBER
212
STREET_NAME
INDUSTRIAL
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206-3920
APN
17728019
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
212 INDUSTRIAL DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' — - ■� KI I INVILDER <br /> 8 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> 1 <br />' Kleinfelder conducted a sensitive receptor survey, push probe assessment and serm-annual <br /> groundwater sampling at the subject site Based upon our findings we have formulated the <br />' following conclusions and recommendations <br /> 1) A total of seven "sensitive receptors" were identified, which were potentially located within a <br />' 2,000-foot radius of a fonder underground storage tank (UST) at the subject site Six of the <br /> receptors were noted as wells and one an unlined canal Based upon groundwater sampling <br /> result in June and July 2000 and the distance and direction of these receptors from the former <br /> UST at the subject site, it is Kleinfelder's opinion that the contaminant plume at the subject <br /> site has not impacted these receptors <br />' 2) Groundwater flow direction during the July 7, 2000 Semi-Annual Sampling event was towards <br /> the northeast at a gradient of 0 005 ft/ft This flow direction and gradient are generally <br />' consistent with previous groundwater elevation data <br /> 3) Total petroleum hydrocarbons as referenced to gasoline and/or benzene were detected in <br /> groundwater samples collected from the three onsite monitonng wells (MW-1 through MW- <br /> 3) and one or more push probe groundwater samples (GP-3 through GP-5) located in the <br /> vicinity of the former UST None of the five oxygenates (ETBE, DIPE, MTBE, TAME or <br />' TBA) or ethanol and methanol were detected during the push probe assessment conducted on <br /> June 1, 2000 <br /> 4) Benzene was detected in groundwater samples in each of the three onsite monitoring wells <br /> MW-1, MW-2 and MW-3 and in a single push probe groundwater sample The benzene <br /> concentrations ranged from 1 0µg/1 from groundwater collected from MW-2 to 1,100 µg11 <br />' from a groundwater sample collected from MW-1 These benzene concentrations are at or <br /> exceed State and Federal MCLS of 1 µg11 and 5 gg/l, respectively Petroleum constituents <br /> detected in groundwater from the three onsite monitoring wells have decreased from previous <br /> sampling events (See Table 1) <br />' 5) The contaminant plume appears be on the shape of an oval in the vicinity of the former UST <br /> and measures approximately 220 by 160 feet The plume appears to be contained at the <br /> subject site although the northern extent appears in close proximity to the northern border of <br />' the site near Industrial Drive <br /> 20-4439-01 801120008726 Page 14 of 17 <br />' Copynght 2000 Kleinfelder, Inc October 16,2000 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.