Laserfiche WebLink
3 BACKGROUND <br /> The following information was obtained from excerpts of previous soil and groundwater <br /> assessment reports prepared by Krazan & Associates, Inc , a summary chronology of the site, and <br /> correspondence from the San Joaquin County Public Health Services Department Environmental <br /> Health Division (PHS/EHD) provided to Klelnfelder by Wilbur-Ellis <br /> In 1965, Wilbur-Ellis Company installed a 1,000-gallon underground gasoline storage tank <br /> (UST) at the site In 1987, the UST and associated piping were removed Low levels of total <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-G) were detected in soil samples collected at the time <br /> of removal Affected soil was excavated and aerated The former UST site was backfilled <br />' In 1993, Wilbur-Ellis sold the property to H & H Engineering and Construction, Inc In 1997, H <br /> & H applied for refinancing of a loan Since no closure letter for the former UST was on file at <br /> the San Joaquin County PHS/EHD, the bank required a subsurface assessment be conducted H <br /> & H retained Krazan & Associates A soil assessment conducted 1n February 1998 found Iow <br /> levels of TPH-G and BTEX compounds in the soil Petroleum hydrocarbons were found in <br /> subsequent groundwater sampling conducted in March 1998 Additional soil and groundwater <br /> sampling, including the installation of three groundwater-monitonng wells, was conducted in <br /> August through November 1998 Quarterly groundwater sampling has continued since that time <br /> In March 2000, the PHS/EHD approved a request by Wilbur-Ellis to reduce the groundwater <br /> sampling frequency to semi-annual, and to discontinue sampling for fuel oxygenates and <br /> alcohols However, according to PHS/EHD, testing for fuel oxygenates and alcohols needs to be <br /> conducted again prior to closure <br /> Groundwater contamination at the site had been evaluated to the south, east and west of the <br /> former underground storage tank location Additional evaluation of the plume to the north and <br /> northwest was requested by PHS/EHD <br /> iKrazan & Associates described the ratio of benzene to gasoline in water samples from MW-1 as <br /> elevated Both the PHS/EHD and Krazan have suggested that the areal distribution of benzene in <br /> groundwater grab samples and monitoring well samples is unusual Possible explanations <br /> suggested by Krazan for the "elevated" benzene concentrations include a source of non-gasoline- <br /> derived benzene from on-site spills or an off-site location <br />' Accordingto Krazan's reports, the areal distribution of the groundwater contarnmation trends <br />' northwest/southeast across the site This observation agrees with field data presented by Krazan <br /> indicating more permeable soils and sand lenses are present to the north-northwest (B-2) and <br /> south-southeast (B-3) of the former underground tank location For former-sampling locations <br /> conducted by Krazan and Associates see Plate 2 <br /> 20-4439-01 E01/2000R726 Page 4 of 17 <br />' Copynght 2000 Klemfelder, Inc October 16,2000 <br />