My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003153
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
I
>
INDUSTRIAL
>
212
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545309
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003153
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2020 9:49:58 PM
Creation date
2/11/2020 9:20:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0003153
RECORD_ID
PR0545309
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0010339
FACILITY_NAME
H&H ENGINEERING CONST INC
STREET_NUMBER
212
STREET_NAME
INDUSTRIAL
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206-3920
APN
17728019
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
212 INDUSTRIAL DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' k" KL ElNFELDER <br /> 1998 Additional soil and groundwater sampling, including the installation of three groundwater- <br /> monitoring wells, was conducted In August through November 1998 Quarterly groundwater <br />' sampling has continued since that tmne In March 2000, the PHS/EHD approved a request by <br /> Wilbur-Ellis to reduce the groundwater sampling frequency to semi-annual, and to discontinue <br /> sampling for fuel oxygenates and alcohols However, according to recent requests by PHS/EHD, <br />' testing for fuel oxygenates and alcohols needs to be conducted again prior to closure <br /> The extent of groundwater contamination at the site had been evaluated to the south, east and <br />' west of the former underground storage tank location Additional evaluation of the plume to the <br /> north and northwest was subsequently requested by PHS/EHD <br /> Krazan & Associates described the ratio of benzene to gasoline in water samples from MW-1 as <br /> elevated Both the PHSIEHD and Krazan have suggested that the aerial distribution of benzene <br /> in groundwater grab samples and monitoring well samples is unusual Possible explanations <br />' suggested by Krazan for the "elevated" benzene concentrations include a source of non-gasoline- <br /> derived benzene from on-site spills or an off-site location <br />' According to Krazan's reports, the aerial distribution of the groundwater contamination trends <br /> northwest/southeast across the site This observation agrees with field data presented by Krazan <br />' indicating more permeable soils and sand tenses are present to the north-northwest (B-2) and <br /> south-southeast (B-3) of the former underground tank location For former-sampling locations <br /> conducted by Krazan and Associates see Plate 2 <br /> Kleinfelder conducted additional environmental services detailed in a report titled "Additional <br /> Subsurface Assessment, Sensitive Receptor Survey and I" Semi-Annual Groundwater Sampling, <br /> Former Underground Storage Tank Site, H&H Engineering and Construction, Inc , 212 Industrial <br /> Dive, Stockton, California 95206", dated October 16, 2000 In summary <br />' A total of seven "sensitive receptors," including six wells and one canal, were identified, which were <br /> potentially located within a 2,000-foot radius of a former underground storage tank (UST) at the subject site <br /> It was Kleinfelder's opinion that the contaminant plume at the subject site at that time had not impacted these <br />' receptors <br /> Groundwater flow direction during the July 7, 2000 semi-annual sampling event was toward the northeast at a <br /> gradient of 0 005 ft Ift This flow direction and gradient are generally consistent with previous groundwater <br />' elevation data <br /> Total petroleum hydrocarbons as referenced to gasoline and/or benzene were detected in groundwater samples <br />' collected from the thiee onsite monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-3) and one or more push probe <br /> groundwater samples (GP-3 through GP-5) located in the vicinity of the former UST None of the five <br /> oxygenates (ETBE, DIPE MTBE, TAME, TBA) ethanol and methanol were detected during the push probe <br /> assessment conducted on June 1, 2000 <br /> Benzene was detected in gioundwater samples in each of the three-onsite monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2 and <br /> MW-3 and in a single push probe groundwater sample The benzene concentrations ranged from 1 0 pg/l <br />' <br /> horn groundwater collected from MW-2 to 1,100 µg/l fiom a gioundwatei sample collected from MW-1 <br /> These benzene concentrations ait, at or exceed State and Federal MCLS of 1 pg/l and 5 pg/l, respectively <br /> 20-4439 01 E03 /2002R010 1'agr 2 of 7 <br /> Copyright 2002 Kleinfelder, Inc January 23 2002 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.