My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
J
>
JAHANT
>
6540
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0545317
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2020 10:53:16 AM
Creation date
2/11/2020 9:28:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545317
PE
2952
FACILITY_ID
FA0005251
FACILITY_NAME
M L GRENZ
STREET_NUMBER
6540
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
JAHANT
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ACAMPO
Zip
95220
APN
00526003
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
6540 E JAHANT RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f� <br /> On Oct . 9, 1991 , Thorpe Oil personnel also supervised the <br /> moving of a metal shop at the north end of the excavation <br /> and a portion of a fence on the south side of the site . <br /> The Oct . 1.6 , 1991 , excavation finally revealed that all <br /> f samples were below detection levels for all tested <br /> substances . ( #7: Attached test results . ) The size of the <br /> eventual excavation was 35 ' deep, 40 ' long , 15 ' wide - <br /> excluding the 10' shelf used for the equipment . <br /> TreaTek Inc . , is in the process of remediating the <br /> approximately 600 cubic yards of spoil that remain on the <br /> property. It. has been moved to a site east of the house and <br /> barn . A projected completion date is Jan . 31 , 1992 . ( #B: <br /> Attached is TreaTek " s workplan . ) <br /> BecauT,e of the extensive excavation done at this s.i.te, this <br /> necessitated the removal of field fences , removal of a large <br /> tree, displacement of a metal shed , damaged pasture area , <br /> yarn covering destroyed by the large equipment and trucks. <br /> Glean soil was brought in to fill the hole. All cast for <br /> these .items have been included in the application , except <br /> for the cast of repaving my yard and driveway . The cost to <br /> replace at the same level of quality could cost $5,000. <br /> Besides the extreme cost of the cleanup , I am facing other <br />( difficulties due t© the imposed laws . Finally, in Feb. , <br /> f 1991 , at the age of 75, I put this 32--acre property on the <br /> market . Early in June, 1991 , I purchased (using funds hoped <br /> for by my sale) a new property. By mid-August , 1991 , I had <br /> a serious, prospective buyer for my ranch. This prospective <br /> deal has been on "hold" for all of these months while I ' ve <br /> f been involved in this cleanup catastrophe. The necessary <br /> additional interest I have paid out is well over $10 ,000 .00. <br /> At 76 years of age, what financial prospects do I' have since <br /> all profits have been eliminated? <br /> Another source of anxiety is whether , or not . I am even <br /> eligible for the cleanup fund . After abiding by the many <br /> rules, regulations , and obstacles put in my way, to think <br /> that I may not be able to recoup any of these losses is <br /> distressing . <br /> When we attended an informational UST meeting in Sept . , <br /> 1.991 , at hlicke Grove , we were assured that the " little guy" <br /> would be the first to be r-eimbursed . Where is that promise <br /> now? <br /> F <br /> I had no choice when the tank was removed on July 17, 1991 , <br /> but to obtain a permit . I did so - following the law in <br /> effect at that time. Because the legislators have changed <br /> laws, do I now have to be excluded from the UST fund? <br /> Page - 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.