Laserfiche WebLink
CRA MEMORANDUM Page 3 <br /> Inorganic Analyses <br /> The LCS/LCSD contained all analytes of interest. LCS recoveries were assessed per the "Guidelines". All LCS <br /> recoveries and RPDs were within the control limits, demonstrating acceptable analytical accuracy and precision. <br /> 6.0 Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate (MS/MSD)Analyses <br /> To evaluate the effects of sample matrices on the extraction or digestion process, measurement procedures, and <br /> accuracy of a particular analysis, samples are spiked with a known concentration of the analyte of concern and <br /> analyzed as MS/MSD samples. The RPD between the MS and MSD is used to assess analytical precision. <br /> MS/MSD analyses were performed as specified in Table 1. If only the MS or MSD recovery was outside of control <br /> limits, no qualification of the data was performed based on the acceptable recovery of the companion spike and the <br /> acceptable RPD. <br /> Organic Analyses <br /> The MS/MSD samples were spiked with the compounds specified in the method. All percent recoveries and RPD <br /> values were within the associated control limits, demonstrating acceptable analytical accuracy and precision with a <br /> few exceptions. Where low recoveries were found the associated sample results were qualified as estimated as <br /> estimated due to the implied low bias. Where an extremely low recovery was found the associated sample result was <br /> rejected due to the poor analytical efficiency demonstrated. <br /> Inorganic Analyses <br /> The MS/MSD samples were spiked with the analytes of interest, and the results were evaluated using the <br /> "Guidelines". All percent recoveries and RPD values were within the control limits, demonstrating acceptable <br /> analytical accuracy and precision with a few exceptions. Where high recoveries were found the associated sample <br /> results were qualified as estimated due to the implied high bias. Where low recoveries were found the associated <br /> sample results were qualified as estimated due to the implied low bias.Where extremely low recoveries were found <br /> the associated sample results were qualified as estimated and the associated non-detect results were rejected due to <br /> poor analytical efficiency demonstrated. <br /> A summary of the organic and inorganic qualifications and exceptions is presented in Table 5. <br /> 7.0 Analyte Reporting <br /> The laboratory did not report any detected concentrations below the laboratory's practical quantitation limit <br /> (PQL)/reporting limit (RL). <br /> All soil results were reported on a wet weight basis. <br /> 8.0 Conclusion <br /> Based on the assessment detailed in the foregoing,the summarized data are acceptable with the specific exceptions <br /> and qualifications noted herein. <br /> EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER <br />