Laserfiche WebLink
Questions Regarding Chain-of-Custody Documentation and Page 2 <br /> ALaboratory Results <br /> Proposed Cintra Park Phase II Development, Tract 2705 <br /> Tracy, California CTE Job No. 20-0445B <br /> "relinquished by" section, however, the date and ti e were left blank. In all of the above <br /> cases, the sample cooler was transported by the sampler (S.S. Teel) from the site to the <br /> Construction Testing, and Engineering (CTE) offic in Tracy, California. The cooler was <br /> placed in a secure area at the CTE office until it as delivered to the Chromalab facility <br /> by Russ Carpenter. This was not properly doe u ented on the chain-of-custody form. <br /> The date and time relinquished should have been filled in and the "receiver" from the <br /> sampler and "relinquisher" to Chromalab (i.e. Russ Carpenter) should have signed the <br /> form. Although the chin-of-custody was not documented properly, the security of the <br /> samples was maintained, and therefore the sample integrity was not compromised. <br /> Another discrepancy on the chain-of-custody fonns was that the incorrect month was <br /> entered on the 4/8/98 form (i.e. "3/8"instead of"4/8"). <br /> -- - .— - If-you-have any-further-qust' ns; lea-sec o riot'he itate tocontact this o�f'ce. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> CONSTRUCTION TESTING & ENGINEERING, INC. <br /> —5 <br /> Steven S. Teel <br /> Senior Geologist <br />