My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HARBOR
>
2705
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0545254
>
COMPLIANCE INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2020 2:24:57 PM
Creation date
2/20/2020 1:11:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
PR0545254
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0025731
FACILITY_NAME
PORT OF STOCKTON
STREET_NUMBER
2705
STREET_NAME
HARBOR
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14502005
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2705 HARBOR ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Port of Stockton - 2 - 21 September 19986 <br /> A power hose and sprinkler was located on the dock, connected to the water supply. Tim Loveland, of <br /> the Port, stated that the hose is only used when hot work(welding) is conducted on the dock. There <br /> was no apparent welding activity at the time of my inspection. I question the need for a power hose to <br /> be connected. Without careful supervision and training, a worker would find the hose a convenient and <br /> efficient method for cleaning off the dock, the ship loader, and the support timbers under the loader by <br /> washing the materials directly into the river. This would be a deliberate act to circumvent BMPs which <br /> reflect Best Available Technology Economically Achievable (BAT) and Best Conventional Technology <br /> Economically Achievable (BCT), and a violation of the NPDES permit. <br /> The ship loader had inadequate dust suppression equipment, and a cloud of sulfur dust spread out over <br /> the dock, adjacent roadway and the Port property. John Benedict went to investigate the cause of the <br /> dust emission by going up to where the ship loader was dropping sulfur into the ship. I did not <br /> participate in the activity as I believed it would necessitate wearing a respirator. Slide photographs were <br /> taken of the areas to document my observations. <br /> A representative of FGL Laboratories arrived at the site to collect water samples of the Deep Water <br /> Channel for Metropolitan Stevedores. Mr. Mogan indicated that the samples were being collected as a <br /> part of its NPDES permit required monitoring program. I suggested the sample be collected from the <br /> area where sulfur had been spilled into the water. I believe the samples were to be analyzed for pH, <br /> COD, suspended solids, electrical conductivity, and metals. <br /> Permit Requirements <br /> Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. 97-042 (NPDES No. CA0084077) were adopted 28 February <br /> 1997 for the Stockton Port District, for Facility-Wide Storm Water Discharges from the Municipal <br /> Separate Storm Sewer System and Non-Storm Water Discharges from the Port of Stockton. Non-storm <br /> water discharges include all discharges from the Port facility that are not solely comprised of storm water <br /> runoff. Discharges :)f spilled material and product handled at the Port directly to a surface water is also <br /> considered a non-s-, rm water discharge. <br /> Discharge Prohibition A.S. states: <br /> "The discharge of material by the Discharger associated with shipping,receiving and <br /> storage activities conducted at the Port, such as, but not limited to, sulfur, coal, cement, <br /> petroleum coke, raw sugar, copper concentrate, and fertilizers, to a surface water is <br /> prohibited. The Discharger shall not be in violation of this prohibition if it demonstrates <br /> that the discharge has not caused an exceedance of a water quality objective, and that it has <br /> applied best management practices that reflect the Best Available Technology <br /> Economically Achievable for nonconventional and toxic pollutants (BAT), and Best <br /> Conventional Technology Economically Achievable for conventional pollutants (BCT),to <br /> minimize or avoid such discharges." <br /> Effluent Limitation B.2. states: <br /> "The Discharger shall reduce or eliminate the discharge of pollutants in non-storm water <br /> discharges identified in Provision D.9 from facilities operated by the Discharger through <br /> implementation of BAT and BCT technologies." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.