Laserfiche WebLink
Port of Stockton - 3 - 21 September 1998 <br /> Provision D.9.c. covers discharge of material associated with loading and unloading activities by the <br /> Discharger, and states: <br /> "The Discharger shall implement BMPs forthwith that reflect BAT and BCT technologies <br /> to prevent or minimize the direct discharge of materials associated with shipping, receiving <br /> and storage activities." <br /> "The Discharger shall evaluate the effectiveness of the BMPs implemented and shall <br /> revise, amend, or add BMPs if the Discharger determines the BMPs are not effective, or at <br /> the request of the Executive Officer." <br /> Inspection Follow-up <br /> Subsequent to the inspection, I reviewed the Independent Audit Report submitted by the Port on <br /> 12 June 1998. Table 2 of the report includes a section of findings with regard to the Port's sulfur loading <br /> dock. The audit recommends that dry methods of cleanup be evaluated for their effectiveness at cleaning <br /> up fugitive dusts and materials, and only use wet methods (e.g. power hoses) if all rinse waters can be <br /> captured. The report also recommends that if the operational controls are not effective, the Port should <br /> implement hardware-based controls, such as enclosed conveyors. <br /> By letter dated 14 September 1998, the Port stated it is installing concrete berms and a corrugated plastic <br /> shed to provide complete containment of the conveyor system where it runs along the ground, and will <br /> also berm and completely enclose the above ground portions of the conveyor system. It also installed <br /> additional tarps on the conveyor belt that inclines to the ship loader, the collection chute, and will place a <br /> catchment tarp below the ship loader. <br /> These controls will be helpful, and are a significant step towards improving the quality of storm water <br /> runoff in the area. I continue to question whether tarp usage to collect spills will be an effective solution <br /> to prevent spills in the vicinity of the inclined conveyor and ship loader, as they may be difficult to <br /> properly implement by those performing the work. The problem of sulfur dust emissions from the ship <br /> loader also does not appear to be addressed. <br /> Industrial Permit Coverage <br /> The conveyor operations at the Port are not now covered by the General Industrial Permit. However, <br /> comments were made during the audit process that conveyor operations at the Port are subject to the <br /> industrial permit. Based on a legal review of the audit comments, this office reevaluated the conveyor <br /> operations and determined that industrial permit coverage is required. The basis for this conclusion is <br /> that the conveyor operation is represented by SIC Code# 4491, Marine Cargo Handling. This SIC Code <br /> is under Category 8 of Attachment 1 (Facilities Covered by this General Permit) in the Industrial Permit <br /> as a Transportation Facility with other operations that are associated with industrial activity. In the <br /> Definitions (Attachment 4) under "Storm Water Associated with Industrial Activity", the permit states: <br /> "For facilities identified in Categories 1 through 9 of Attachment 1 of this General Permit, the term <br /> includes,but is not limited to, storm water discharges from industrial plant yards, ...material handling <br /> sites, ...sites used for storage and maintenance of material handling equipment." <br />