My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INSTALL_2004
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
G
>
GRANT LINE
>
2615
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0521537
>
INSTALL_2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2020 10:41:34 PM
Creation date
2/27/2020 3:48:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
INSTALL
FileName_PostFix
2004
RECORD_ID
PR0521537
PE
2371
FACILITY_ID
FA0014623
FACILITY_NAME
WEST VALLEY AUTO SERVICE LLC
STREET_NUMBER
2615
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
GRANT LINE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95304
APN
21229017
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2615 W GRANT LINE RD
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
386
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ameron Dualoy° Pipe Monitoring System <br /> in/deg. This is significantly larger effect than for the no-vapor tests. If this result is <br /> extrapolated to a 300 ft line with a temperature change of 30 deg F, the total level <br /> change in the brine reservoir due to temperature is of the order of 6.35 inches. This <br /> change in fluid level is the full range of the change. By adding a "service factor" <br /> multiplier of 1.5 to this number, the false alarm probability is reduced dramatically, well <br /> below the required maximum. As noted in earlier discussion, the direct extrapolation of <br /> the trapped vapor results from 21 ft to 300 ft will lead to exaggerated effects. It is <br /> estimated that the results would be about 30% to 40% higher than for an actual 300 ft <br /> installation due to having proportionally fewer fittings, the primary location of trapped air. <br /> Gravity filled Interstice <br /> The interstice was originally filled with brine using gravity feed. These tests were <br /> more exploratory in nature and the results are not as well defined. They are provided in <br /> Table 2 for ease of comparison with the other test conditions for the evaluation. The <br /> average result of these tests was 0.0129 in/deg. These results show the gravity filled <br /> interstice performs between the evacuated (best case) and vapor injected (worst case) <br /> results. Designing to the worst-case conditions described in the previous section is <br /> conservative. <br /> Time to Detect a 0.1 Gal/h Leak <br /> Liquid volume transferred into the interstice from a leak in the primary line or a <br /> loss of liquid from a leak in the secondary pipe is immediately and directly seen as a <br /> level change in the reservoir of this system. This was demonstrated by removing brine <br /> from the interstice at a rate of 0.10 gal/h. The results of this test are shown in Figure D- <br /> 6 in Appendix D. The rate of change in the brine reservoir level for a 0.1 gal/h leak was <br /> observed to be 0.05 in/min. This rate of level change in the reservoir is independent of <br /> line size. If the level must change by 5 inches to produce an alarm, the alarm would <br /> occur in approximately 100 minutes. <br /> A leak in the secondary pipe would release interstitial liquid to the environment <br /> and would not necessarily be immediately critical. A leak from the primary pipe would <br /> however, present a potential loss to the environment and should result in an immediate <br /> shut down of the turbine. <br /> Catastrophic Failure Test <br /> The effect of a catastrophic failure of the primary pipe was of some concern. To <br /> simulate these conditions a pressurized tank of brine was attached to each of the bleed <br /> ports. Brine at a pressure of 40 psi was then introduced into the interstice at the <br /> maximum rate the interstice would accept the liquid. For the port located 21 ft from the <br /> reservoir the flow rate into the interstice was approximately 0.2 gal/min or slightly less <br /> than 0.7 liters/min. This would produce a high level alarm is less than two minutes. <br /> At a distance of four feet from the reservoir, the flow rate into the reservoir was <br /> observed to be approximately one gal/min, a substantially large flow rate than at 21 ft. <br /> A failure of the primary pipe at this distance would result in an alarm is approximately 15 <br /> seconds. Longer distances would undoubtedly produce lower flow rates. <br /> Page 11 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.