Laserfiche WebLink
Diesel Impacted Soil Removal Report May 2010 <br /> California Army National Guard Armory <br /> Lodi, CA <br /> ■ Local Depth to First Groundwater. Although site-specific data are not available, CVRWQCB's <br /> Geotracker database indicated that depth to first groundwater at two sites within one-half mile of <br /> the site in Lodi ranged from 54 to 67 feet bgs in November-December 2009. Considering that the <br /> Interim Final ESLs are based on shallower groundwater conditions,the guidance level of <br /> 180 mg/kg for TPH-D may be viewed as conservative for the specific conditions at this site. <br /> ■ Horizontal Variability in Floor Soil Samples and Preponderance of Measurements Less <br /> than 10 mg/kg TPH-D. The two floor samples were collected approximately 18 inches apart,by <br /> design. Because the two samples differed significantly(2.2 versus 140 mg/kg)and because the <br /> 2.2 mg/kg TPH-D floor sample was consistent with the four additional side-wall samples which <br /> were all less than 6 mg/kg TPH-D, it is reasonable to conclude that the single elevated floor <br /> sample does not represent overall soil conditions. <br /> ■ Vertical Attenuation of TPH-D Concentration. The single floor sample (LODI-SO-11)at <br /> 140 mg/kg was collected approximately 30 inches below the initial pre-characterization sample <br /> which had 13,000 mg/kg TPH-D at a depth of approximately 6 inches. Given that the fuel spill <br /> reportedly caused a release of TPH-D at the surface of the soil,these data indicate that there has <br /> been a vertical attenuation of TPH-D by almost two orders of magnitude across 30 inches of soil. <br /> 5.2 Evaluation Discussion <br /> In consideration of the finding of one soil sample with a TPH-D concentration above the 100 mg/kg <br /> guidance level adopted for this removal action and based on insights provided by the CVRWQCB, OTIE <br /> evaluated screening levels established by the SFRWQCB for potential applicability to this site. <br /> Additionally,OTIE considered regional depth to groundwater data as well as site-specific conditions <br /> relating to the specific confirmation samples. The objective of these considerations, as addressed <br /> individually below,was to determine whether the confirmation sampling results reflected in Table 2 <br /> warrant further site removal actions. <br /> OTIE evaluated Interim Final ESLs established by the SFRWQCB in November 2007 and revised in May <br /> 2008. Specifically, OTIE referred to the ESL for TPH-D (middle distillates)under a commercial/ <br /> industrial land use presented in Table A—Shallow Soils (< 3 meters bgs), Groundwater is a Current or <br /> Potential Source of Drinking Water; and in Table B—Shallow Soils (< 3 meters bgs), Groundwater is not <br /> a Current or Potential Source of Drinking Water. The ESL for TPH-D in Table A is 83 mg/kg,which is <br /> below the concentration detected in confirmation sample LODI-SO-11. The ESL for TPH-D in Table B is <br /> 180 mg/kg,which is above the concentration detected in that confirmation sample. It is noted that ESLs <br /> are intended to aid in expediting the identification of potential environmental concerns at a site, and not <br /> necessarily as cleanup standards. Comparison of data to ESLs is one tool in determining the potential <br /> need for additional action at a site,but an exceedance of the ESL does not necessarily indicate that <br /> additional actions are required or appropriate. <br /> Whereas it is understood that the CVRWQCB considers all groundwater in the Central Valley to be a <br /> potential source of drinking water unless demonstrated otherwise,we believe it is important to take into <br /> consideration potential mitigating factors specific to the region and/or area. Pursuant to the ESL <br /> documentation, a groundwater occurrence may be excluded from consideration as a potential source of <br /> drinking water if TDS concentrations are greater than or equal to 3,000 mg/L, or if the water bearing unit <br /> is not sufficiently permeable to produce an average sustained yield of 200 gallons of water per day. <br /> Although no specific data relative to TDS concentrations or well yield exist for first groundwater at the <br /> site or in the immediate area of the site due to typical influences on shallow groundwater by historical <br /> agricultural activities in the Central Valley, it is possible that TDS concentrations are sufficiently high <br /> that the shallowest groundwater occurrence would not be considered a potential source of drinking water. <br />