Laserfiche WebLink
Diesel Impacted Soil Removal Report May 2010 <br /> California Army National Guard Armory <br /> Lodi, CA <br /> 4.2 CONFIRMATION SAMPLING <br /> On April 2,2010, OTIE oversaw excavation and backfilling activities at the site. Following excavation <br /> activities,and prior to backfilling and compaction activities, in accordance with the strategy defined in the <br /> Workplan, OTIE collected floor and sidewall confirmation soil samples. Confirmation soil sample results <br /> for soil samples indicated in Figure 4 are summarized in Table 2 below. Laboratory analytical results for <br /> confirmation soil samples are presented on CD as Appendix D to this document. <br /> Table 2 <br /> Confirmation Soil Sample Results <br /> Sample TPH-D <br /> Sample ID Sample Location Depth (mg/kg) <br /> LODI-SO-10 Floor sample-center of spill area (northern sample) 3 feet 2.2 Y <br /> LODI-SO-11 Floor sample-center of spill area(southern sample) 3 feet 140 <br /> LODI-SO-12 Sidewall sample(center-southern sidewall) 13 inches 5.2 Y <br /> LODI-SO-13 Sidewall sample(center-western sidewall) 14 inches 3.2 Y <br /> LODI-SO-14 Sidewall sample(center-northern sidewall) 13 inches 4.8 <br /> LODI-SO-15 Sidewall sample (center-eastern sidewall) 13 inches 1.4 Y <br /> Note: Y= Sample exhibits chromatographic pattern that does not resemble the standard <br /> As noted in Table 2,results (either detections or"Y-flagged") from the six soil samples were below the <br /> 100 mg/kg threshold by a factor ranging from 20 to 50 with the exception of sample LODI-SO-11 <br /> (140 mg/kg). To confirm that the detection in this sample was replicable, OTIE requested that C&T re- <br /> analyze the sample and the re-analysis confirmed the original results. <br /> 5.0 DATA EVALUATION <br /> 5.1 Evaluation Summary <br /> To evaluate the significance of the single soil sample that exceeded the 100 mg/kg threshold used as a <br /> reference cleanup goal for the site, OTIE considered five lines of reasoning to place this result in proper <br /> context and provide a reasonable basis for judgment for a finding of NFA. The five lines of reasoning are <br /> summarized below and discussed in more detail in the narrative following our summary. <br /> ■ Interim Final Environmental Screening Levels for Groundwater Protection. Using the 2008 <br /> SFRWQCB Interim Final Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) for TPH-D(middle distillates) <br /> under a commercial/industrial land use,the ESL for TPH-D applicable for shallow soil at sites <br /> where groundwater is not a current or potential source of drinking water is 180 mg/kg. <br /> ■ Local Groundwater Quality and Yield. Although CVRWQCB considers all groundwater to be <br /> a potential source of drinking water, local groundwater may be excluded from consideration as a <br /> potential source of drinking water if total dissolved solids(TDS) is greater than or equal to <br /> 3,000 milligrams per liter(mg/L), or if the water-bearing unit is not sufficiently permeable to <br /> produce an average sustained yield of 200 gallons of water per day. Given the long history of <br /> regional agricultural operations, it is possible that TDS concentrations are sufficiently high that <br /> the shallowest groundwater occurrence would not be considered a potential source of drinking <br /> water. <br />