Laserfiche WebLink
I TABLE 1 <br /> .� Summary of Monitoring Well Field Logs <br /> Well Date Volume Temp pH Conductivity Dissolved Turbidity <br /> purged (°C) units (mS/s) Oxygen <br /> (gallons) <br /> m <br /> MW-1 6/22/95 0.5 23.9 5.66 1.15 9.2 Moderate <br /> 1.5 20.1 5.45 1.40 18.1 Moderate <br /> L' 3.0 19.5 5.49 1.49 39.4 Moderate <br /> 4.5 19.1 5.49 1.51 8.1 Moderate <br /> 1V1W-2 6/22195 0.5 19.4 4.43 1.91 20.7 High <br /> Lo 1.5 17.9 4.34 1.81 20.7 Moderate <br /> 3.0 17.4 4.34 1.88 21.5 Low <br /> 4.5 17.3 4.37 1.90 22.2 Low <br /> MW-3 6122195 0.5 22.2 4.51 2.54 0.4 High <br /> 1.5 19.1 4.48 2.67 0.6 Moderate <br /> 3.0 18.4 4.49 2.75 0.7 Low <br /> 4.5 18.2 4.51 2.75 1.1 Low <br /> MW-4 6/22195 0.5 23.6 4.45 1.54 30.9 High <br /> 1.5 21.2 4.43 1.56 45.6 Low <br /> 3.0 20.9 4.68 1.64 33.6 Low <br /> 4.5 20.2 5.14 1.76 38.4 Low <br /> MW-5 6122195 0.5 21.9 4.88 1.20 33.3 High <br /> 1.5 19.7 4.83 1.21 33.6 High <br /> 3.0 19.1 4.87 1.21 32.6 Moderate <br /> 4.5 19.0 4.92 1.21 32.4 Moderate <br /> MW-6 6122/95 0.5 22.2 5.42 1.54 22.7 High <br /> r. <br /> 1.5 19.4 5.36 1.61 7.7 High <br /> 3.0 19.0 5.41 1.61 6.5 Moderate <br /> 4.5 18.8 5.43 1.62 8.9 Moderate <br /> .t. The detection limits quoted above are the minimum reportable levels specified by the <br /> analytical laboratory. The presence of other hydrocarbons may raise the detection limits <br /> for particular constituents. Refer to the laboratory data sheets in Appendix A for sample <br /> specific detection limits. <br /> The water samples collected for dissolved chromium and lead analyses were filtered in the <br /> �., laboratory under controlled conditions. After filtration, each sample was preserved with <br /> nitric acid per method specifications. This methodology was employed to reduce the risk <br /> of field contamination caused by overhandling of samples. <br /> American Geological Services, Inc. <br /> CA95DE-029 <br /> 6 <br />