My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012435
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LODI
>
501
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505714
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012435
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2020 9:44:05 AM
Creation date
3/4/2020 9:16:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012435
RECORD_ID
PR0505714
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0003590
FACILITY_NAME
M B P
STREET_NUMBER
501
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
LODI
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
03731045
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
501 W LODI AVE
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> 30 April 1999 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 98-0450 <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br /> ' then calculated by subtracting the measured depth to ground water from the surveyed casing <br /> elevation <br /> ' After water levels were measured,approximately 40 gallons (a minimum of three well volumes per <br /> well) of water were purged from wells BMW-1 and BMW-2, and approximately 5 to 8 gallons of <br /> water were purged from wells BMW-3, BMW-4, BMW-5 and MW-5 utilizing a two-stage <br /> submersible pump An ICM Model 52200 water analyzer was utilized to monitor temperature,pH <br /> and conductivity of purged water at regular purge volumes Field data and logs are Included with <br /> Appendix B Purged ground water was contamenzed in 55-gallon drums and stored on-site in an area <br /> ' lacking general public access <br /> ' 2 3 GROUND WATER SAMPLE COLLECTION <br /> ' The ground water levels in the wells were allowed to recover overnight The wells were then <br /> sampled on 24 February 1999 Ground water samples were collected utilizing disposable <br /> polyethylene bailers and new nylon rope Sufficient ground water sample was collected from each <br /> well to fill a one-liter amber bottle and three EPA-approved 40-m1 volatile organic analysis (VOA) <br /> vials contauung 0 5 ml of hydrochloric acid(18%) as a preservative for the samples Care was taken <br /> to ensure that visible air bubbles were not present in the VOAs after filling and capping Ground <br /> 1 water sample containers were labeled with the well designation, date, time, and sampler's initials <br /> 2 4 LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> Each ground water sample was logged on a chain-of-custody form,placed in a chilled container and <br /> 1 transported to a McCampbell Analytical, Inc (MAI) of Pacheco, California, a State of California <br /> Department of Health Services (DHS)-certified laboratory for analysis in accordance with <br />' • EPA Method 8015 Modified for total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline and <br /> diesel (TPH-g and TPH-d, respectively), <br /> • EPA Method 8020 for volatile aromatics (benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene <br /> BTE&X) and <br />' • EPA Method 8250 Modified for volatile organic compounds (VOCs)and di-isopropyl ether <br /> (DIPE), ethyl tert butyl ether(ETRE), methyl-tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), tert amyl methyl <br /> ether(TAME) and tertiary butanol (TBA) <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.