Laserfiche WebLink
' C,e6&g6cal7-edwCS rico. <br /> Page 10 <br /> Additional Site Characterization <br /> &4'n Quarter Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Project No. 1030.2 <br /> February 20,2004 <br /> The shallow geology of the site is characterized by clay and silt, primarily gray in color, <br /> with varied degrees of plasticity. A dirty sand layer was encountered through out the site at <br /> approximately 15-feet bgs. A clay layer dominates the site between 19 and 22 feet bgs. <br /> ' Each of the sites four water table wells terminated in "plastic" clay. The deep well (MW- <br /> 101) terminated in highly plastic "fat" clay. Groundwater was encountered between 11.5- <br /> 12.5 feet bgs. The capillary fringe extended approximately 4 feet above the water table. <br /> 3.3 Hydrology of Site <br /> 1 On October 15, 2003, the depth to groundwater was measured in the five existing <br /> monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-4 and MW-101) prior to purging. Depths to <br /> groundwater in the monitoring wells averaged 11.24 feet below the top of casing. The new <br /> monitoring well was installed after the fourth quarter groundwater-monitoring event. The <br /> ' new well (MW-5) will be incorporated into the quarterly groundwater-monitoring routine <br /> beginning the first quarter of 2004. <br /> ' The average groundwater elevation for the October 2003 monitoring event was 65.37 feet <br /> above mean sea level (MSL). Site-specific groundwater bearing and slope were calculated <br /> using MW-1, MW-2 and MW-4 and found to be N40°E @ 0.0048 ft/ft. These results are <br /> consistent with historical groundwater calculations at the site. <br /> Groundwater elevation, bearing and slope were calculated from data gathered during the <br /> October 2003, monitoring event and the results are summarized in Table 7 of Appendix A. <br /> A groundwater gradient map is included as Figure 4. <br /> 1 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> This investigation was an effort to define the lateral extent of petroleum hydrocarbons and <br /> other fuel constituents in the soil to determine the boundaries of soil excavation as a <br /> remedial option. Groundwater was sampled in the locations of a potential NNW/SSE <br /> trending sand channel under the site. The following conclusions have been drawn from the <br /> data generated from this site investigation work: <br /> ' Soil Investigation <br /> • Shadow contamination was only detected near the locations of GP-1 and GP-3 <br /> ' o The upper 7.5 feet of soil beyond these points is relatively clean and can be used to <br /> back fill the excavation (if excavation is the remediation method used) <br /> The soil plume appears to be defined by the following points: <br /> ❑ to the north by SB-2: non-detect <br /> ❑ to the east by GP-7: non-detect <br /> ❑ to the south by GP-9: non-detect <br /> ❑ to the west by GP-10: non-detect <br /> ' - • -Shallow contamination between 6 and 11 feet bgs occupies anareaof approximately <br /> 2,100 square feet or approximately 375 cubic yards (Figure 5) <br /> Intermediate depth contamination is wider spread and appears to be upgradient from the <br /> site of the former UST. This is likely due to preferential pathways supplied by leach <br /> lines and tree roots. <br /> 1 <br />